Similar articles

• Tumour induction by methyl-nitroso-urea following preconceptional paternal contamination with plutonium-239.

  Lord BI, Woolford LB, Wang L, Stones VA, McDonald D, Lorimore SA, Papworth D, Wright EG, Scott D. Lord BI, et al. Br J Cancer. 1998 Aug;78(3):301-11. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.491. Br J Cancer. 1998. PMID: 9703275 Free PMC article.
• Reasons it is doubtful that preconceptional paternal irradiation with plutonium-239 had any effect on cancer induction by methyl-nitroso-urea.

  Selby PB. Selby PB. Br J Cancer. 1999 Nov;81(6):1094-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690812. Br J Cancer. 1999. PMID: 10576670 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
• Hemopoietic damage and induction of leukemia in offspring due to preconception paternal irradiation from incorporated plutonium-239.

  Lord BI, Hoyes KP. Lord BI, et al. Radiat Res. 1999 Dec;152(6 Suppl):S34-7. Radiat Res. 1999. PMID: 10564933
• Modulation of the incidence of murine leukemia and lymphoma.

  Clayson DB. Clayson DB. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1984;13(2):183-95. doi: 10.3109/10408448409034081. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1984. PMID: 6380961 Review. No abstract available.
• Evaluation of evidence for infection as a mode of action for induction of rat lymphoma.

  Caldwell JC, Jinot J, DeVoney D, Gift JS. Caldwell JC, et al. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2008 Mar;49(2):155-64. doi: 10.1002/em.20356. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2008. PMID: 18095346 Review.