Functional outcome of conversion of ileorectal anastomosis to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis
- PMID: 10411437
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02237099
Functional outcome of conversion of ileorectal anastomosis to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to review the functional outcome in 20 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis who were converted from ileorectal anastomosis to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
Methods: From 1985 to 1997, 12 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (5 males; mean age, 39.1 years) and 8 patients with ulcerative colitis (5 males; mean age, 36.7 years) underwent conversion from ileorectal anastomosis to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Clinical and operative data were analyzed retrospectively. Functional results were obtained by telephone interview in 16 patients (94 percent) after pouch construction. Four patients were not interviewed (2 were deceased, 1 was lost to follow-up, and 1 was not reachable).
Results: Indications for conversion were uncontrollable rectal polyps (10 patients) and colonic cancer found in the pathology specimen after ileorectal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (2 patients), intractable proctitis (5 patients), colonic cancer found in the pathology specimen of patients with ulcerative colitis after ileorectal anastomosis (2 patients), and rectal dysplasia (1 patients). Mean follow-up time was 5 (range, 1-11) years. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was handsewn in 14 patients, and the remaining cases were double-stapled in 4 patients with ulcerative colitis. No intraoperative difficulties were reported in 13 cases; technical problems were related to adhesions (3 cases), difficult rectal dissection (2 cases), and stapler-related difficulties (2 cases). Postoperative complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis included small-bowel obstruction (4 patients) and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis leak (1 patient). Patients with ileorectal anastomosis vs. those with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis had a better functional outcome with regard to nighttime continence (14 (88 percent) vs. 6 (38 percent) patients) and average bowel movements (<6/day; 12 (75 percent) vs. 4 (25 percent) patients). Complete daytime continence, 15 (94 percent) vs. 10 (62 percent) patients, was similar in the two groups. Physical and emotional well-being were similarly rated as very good to excellent.
Conclusions: In patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis with ileorectal anastomosis, conversion to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis may be required. In view of the risk of rectal cancer or intractable proctitis, patients seem to accept the conversion in spite of poorer bowel function.
Comment in
-
Conversion of ileorectal anastomosis.Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Jan;43(1):119. doi: 10.1007/BF02237262. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000. PMID: 10813140 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis revisited.Fam Cancer. 2006;5(3):241-60; discussion 261-2. doi: 10.1007/s10689-005-5672-4. Fam Cancer. 2006. PMID: 16998670 Review.
-
Comparison of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Aug;42(8):1028-33; discussion 1033-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02236696. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999. PMID: 10458126
-
Does better functional result equate with better quality of life? Implications for surgical treatment in familial adenomatous polyposis.Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Jun;43(6):829-35; discussion 835-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02238022. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000. PMID: 10859085
-
Outcome of primary and secondary ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Jul;44(7):984-92. doi: 10.1007/BF02235487. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001. PMID: 11496079
-
Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: Points of controversy.J Visc Surg. 2014 Sep;151(4):281-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 Jul 3. J Visc Surg. 2014. PMID: 24999229 Review.
Cited by
-
Ulcerative colitis: the fate of the retained rectum.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2004 Feb;17(1):29-34. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-823068. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2004. PMID: 20011282 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Term Surgical Outcomes and Pathological Analysis of Proctectomy Specimens after Subtotal Colectomy for Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a Tertiary Centre.J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 2;12(17):5729. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175729. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37685796 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of sex on 30-day complications and long-term functional outcomes following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 May;33(5):619-625. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3020-z. Epub 2018 Mar 16. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018. PMID: 29549433
-
Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis revisited.Fam Cancer. 2006;5(3):241-60; discussion 261-2. doi: 10.1007/s10689-005-5672-4. Fam Cancer. 2006. PMID: 16998670 Review.
-
Adenocarcinomas After Prophylactic Surgery For Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.J Cancer Ther. 2013;4(1):260-270. doi: 10.4236/jct.2013.41033. J Cancer Ther. 2013. PMID: 23875116 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical