Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 Aug;48(2):148-53.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00995.x.

Effect of activated charcoal alone or given after gastric lavage in reducing the absorption of diazepam, ibuprofen and citalopram

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effect of activated charcoal alone or given after gastric lavage in reducing the absorption of diazepam, ibuprofen and citalopram

O Lapatto-Reiniluoto et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 Aug.

Abstract

Aims: The efficacy of activated charcoal alone, and gastric lavage followed by charcoal in reducing the absorption of diazepam, ibuprofen and citalopram was studied in healthy volunteers.

Methods: In a randomized cross-over study with three phases, nine healthy volunteers were administered single oral doses of 5 mg diazepam, 400 mg ibuprofen and 20 mg citalopram, taken simultaneously after an overnight fast. Thirty minutes later, the subjects were assigned to one of the following treatments: 200 ml water (control), 25 g activated charcoal as a suspension in 200 ml water or gastric lavage followed by 25 g charcoal in suspension given through the lavage tube. Plasma concentrations of diazepam, ibuprofen and citalopram were determined up to 10 h.

Results: The AUC(0,10 h) of diazepam was reduced by 27% (P<0.05) by both charcoal alone and charcoal combined with lavage. The increase in plasma diazepam concentration from 0.5 h onwards was prevented by both interventions (P</=0.05), whereas the Cmax of diazepam was not significantly affected by either treatment. The AUC(0, 10 h) of ibuprofen was reduced by 49% (P<0.05) after the combination treatment and by 30% (P<0.05) after charcoal alone, but there was no significant difference between these two treatments. Both charcoal alone and the combination treatment were equally effective in preventing the increase in plasma ibuprofen from 0.5 h onwards (P<0.01). The Cmax of ibuprofen was reduced by 45% (P<0.05) and by 21% (P=NS), respectively. The AUC(0,10 h) of citalopram was reduced by 51% (P<0.05) after both charcoal alone and charcoal combined with lavage, and the Cmax by 52% (P<0.05) and 54% (P<0.05), respectively. The increase in plasma citalopram concentration from 0.5 h onwards was reduced by about 50% (P<0.01) by both interventions.

Conclusions: Activated charcoal alone and charcoal combined with lavage showed similar efficacy in preventing the absorption of diazepam, ibuprofen and citalopram. These results suggest that gastric lavage needs not be routinely performed before administration of charcoal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean plasma concentrations of diazepam in nine healthy volunteers after a 5 mg oral dose, following water (control; ▪), 25 g activated charcoal (•) or gastric lavage followed by 25 g activated charcoal (▴). For clarity, only mean values are given.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of activated charcoal alone and charcoal in combination with gastric lavage on the absorption of the study drugs from 0.5 h onwards, as measured by CΔ (mean±s.e.mean, see Methods). *Significantly different from control.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean plasma concentrations of ibuprofen in nine healthy volunteers after a 400 mg oral dose, following water (control; ▪), 25 g activated charcoal (•) or gastric lavage followed by 25 g activated charcoal (▴). For clarity, only mean values are given.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean plasma concentrations of citalopram in nine healthy volunteers after a 20 mg oral dose, following water (control; ▪), 25 g activated charcoal (•) or gastric lavage followed by 25 g activated charcoal (▴). For clarity, only mean values are given.

References

    1. Henry JA, Hoffman JR. Continuing controversy on gut decontamination. Lancet. 1998;352:420–421. . - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology and European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. Position statement: gastric lavage. Clin Toxicol. 1997;35:711–719. - PubMed
    1. Pond SM, Lewis-Driver DJ, Williams GM, Green AC, Stevenson NW. Gastric emptying in acute overdose: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Med J Aust. 1995;163:345–349. - PubMed
    1. Kulig K, Bar-Or D, Cantrill SV, Rosen P, Rumack BH. Management of acutely poisoned patients without gastric emptying. Ann Emerg Med. 1985;14:562–567. - PubMed
    1. Gaillard Y, Gay-Montchamp J-P, Ollagnier M. Simultaneous screening and quantitation of alpidem, zolpidem, buspirone and benzodiazepines by dual-channel gas chromatography using electron-capture and nitrogen-phosphorus detection after solid-phase extraction. J Chromatogr. 1993;622:197–208. - PubMed

MeSH terms