Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Jul;14(7):402-8.
doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.09078.x.

Smoking status as a vital sign

J S Ahluwalia  1 , C A Gibson, R E Kenney, D D Wallace, K Resnicow
Affiliations

Smoking status as a vital sign

J S Ahluwalia et al. J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: We conducted this study to determine if a smoking status stamp would prompt physicians to increase the number of times they ask, advise, assist, and arrange follow-up for African-American patients about smoking-related issues.

Design: An intervention study with a posttest assessment (after the physician visit) conducted over four 1-month blocks. The control period was the first 2 weeks of each month, while the following 2 weeks served as the intervention period.

Setting: An adult walk-in clinic in a large inner-city hospital.

Participants: We consecutively enrolled into the study 2,595 African-American patients (1,229 intervention and 1, 366 control subjects) seen by a housestaff physician.

Interventions: A smoking status stamp placed on clinic charts during the intervention period.

Main results: Forty-five housestaff rotated through the clinic in 1-month blocks. In univariate analyses, patients were significantly more likely to be asked by their physicians if they smoke cigarettes during the intervention compared with the control period, 78.4% versus 45.6% (odds ratio [OR] 4.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.58, 5.10). Patients were also more likely to be told by their physician to quit, 39.9% versus 26.9% (OR 1.81; 95% CI 1.36, 2.40), and have follow-up arranged, 12.3% versus 6.2% (OR 2.16; 95% CI 1.30, 3.38).

Conclusions: The stamp had a significant effect on increasing rates of asking about cigarette smoking, telling patients to quit, and arranging follow-up for smoking cessation. However, the stamp did not improve the low rate at which physicians offered patients specific advice on how to quit or in setting a quit date.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Smoking status stamp placed on clinic encounter charts.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Smoking Cessation: Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, Md: Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1996.
    1. Rose G, Hamilton PJS, Colwell L, Shipley MJ. A randomised controlled trial of anti-smoking advice: 10-year results. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 1982;36:102–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kottke TE, Battista RN, DeFriese GH, Brekke ML. Attributes of successful smoking cessation interventions in medical practice: a meta-analysis of 39 controlled trials. JAMA. 1988;259:2883–9. - PubMed
    1. Schwartz JL. Smoking Cessation Methods. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1987. USDHHS publication 87:2940.
    1. Fisher M. Report of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. Baltimore, Md: Williams and Wilkins; 1989.

Publication types