Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1999 Jul;14(7):425-31.
doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.07238.x.

Screening for undetected mental disorders in high utilizers of primary care services

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Screening for undetected mental disorders in high utilizers of primary care services

F Lefevre et al. J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To define the prevalence and detection rates of mental disorders among high utilizers as compared with typical utilizers, and to examine the effect of case-mix adjustment on these parameters.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: General internal medicine outpatient clinic associated with an urban, academic medical center.

Patients: From patients attending a general medicine clinic, 304 were selected randomly in three utilization groups, defined by number of clinic visits: (1) high utilizers; (2) case-mix adjusted high utilizers; and (3) typical utilizers (control patients).

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: The presence of any mental disorder was ascertained by the PRIME-MD screening instrument. Chart review on all patients was performed to ascertain mental disorders detected by primary care physicians. The prevalence of mood disorders was markedly higher in high utilizers (29%) than in adjusted high utilizers (15%) or controls (10%) (p <.001). Anxiety disorders were slightly, but not statistically, more prevalent in the group adjusted for case mix (16%) than in other high utilizers (12%) or controls (9%). Alcoholism was significantly more prevalent in controls (12%) than in adjusted (6%) or other high utilizers (3%) (p <.03). The discrepancy in detection rates between PRIME-MD and chart review for any mental disorder was less for high utilizers (37% vs 31%) as compared with adjusted high utilizers (31% vs 11%) or controls (24% vs 8%).

Conclusions: Mood disorders are associated with a high overall burden of illness, while anxiety disorders are more predominant among outliers after case-mix adjustment. Detection rates differ substantially by utilization pattern. Screening efforts can be more appropriately targeted with knowledge of these patterns.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Saravay S. Psychiatric interventions in the medically ill: outcome and effectiveness research. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1996;19:467–80. - PubMed
    1. Hall RCW, Wise MG. The clinical and financial burden of mood disorders: cost and outcome. Psychosomatics. 1995;36(suppl):S11–8. - PubMed
    1. Katzelnick DJ, Kobak KA, Greist JH, et al. Effect of primary care treatment of depression on service use by patients with high medical expenditures. Psychiatr Serv. 1997;48:59–64. - PubMed
    1. Simon GE, Katzelnick DJ. Depression, use of medical services and cost-offset effects. J Psychosomat Res. 1997;42:333–44. - PubMed
    1. Broadhead WE, Leon AC, Weissman MM, et al. Development and validation of the SDDS-PC screen for multiple mental disorders in primary care. Arch Fam Med. 1995;4:211–9. - PubMed

Publication types