Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Jul;17(7):1007-15.
doi: 10.1097/00004872-199917070-00018.

Impact of arterial elastance as a measure of vascular load on left ventricular geometry in hypertension

P S Saba  1 , A Ganau, R B Devereux, R Pini, T G Pickering, M J Roman
Affiliations

Impact of arterial elastance as a measure of vascular load on left ventricular geometry in hypertension

P S Saba et al. J Hypertens. 1999 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: Effective arterial elastance (Ea), integrating the pulsatile component of left ventricular (LV) afterload, is an estimate of aortic input impedance. We evaluated relationships of Ea with left ventricular anatomy and function in essential hypertension.

Design: A cross-sectional analysis in 81 normotensive and 174 untreated hypertensive individuals enrolled in a referral hypertension centre.

Methods: Using echocardiography we determined left ventricular mass index (LVMI), relative wall thickness (RWT), stroke volume (SV), endocardial (FSe) and midwall (FSm) fractional shortening and total peripheral resistance (TPR). Carotid pressure waveforms were obtained by arterial tonometry, and end-systolic pressure (Pes) was measured at the dicrotic notch. Ea index (EaI) was calculated as Pes/(SV index); LV elastance (Ees) was estimated as Pes/LV end-systolic volume, and ventriculo-arterial coupling was evaluated by the Ea/Ees ratio.

Results: EaI was higher in hypertensives than in normotensives (3.02 +/- 0.63 versus 2.40 +/- 0.52 mmHg/l per m2; P< 0.0001). Using the 95% upper confidence limit in normotensives, hypertensives were divided in two groups with normal or elevated EaI. The 38 hypertensives with elevated EaI had higher RWT (0.41 +/- 0.06 versus 0.37 +/- 0.05), lower LVMI (87.5 +/- 18.5 versus 96.8 +/- 19.3 g/m2), higher TPR (2247 +/- 408 versus 1658 +/- 371 dynes/cm s(-5)) and lower FSe and FSm (35 +/- 5 versus 39 +/- 5 and 16 +/- 2 versus 18 +/- 2%; all P< 0.05) than patients with normal EaI. Ea/Ees ratio was increased and cardiac output was reduced in hypertensives with elevated EaI.

Conclusions: High values of EaI identify a minority of hypertensive patients characterized by elevated TPR, left ventricular concentric remodelling, depressed left ventricular systolic function and impaired ventriculo-arterial coupling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types