Hepatic retransplantation in cholestatic liver disease: impact of the interval to retransplantation on survival and resource utilization
- PMID: 10421646
- PMCID: PMC2957088
- DOI: 10.1002/hep.510300210
Hepatic retransplantation in cholestatic liver disease: impact of the interval to retransplantation on survival and resource utilization
Abstract
The aim of our study was to quantitatively assess the impact of hepatic retransplantation on patient and graft survival and resource utilization. We studied patients undergoing hepatic retransplantation among 447 transplant recipients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) at 3 transplantation centers. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used for survival analysis. Measures of resource utilization included the duration of hospitalization, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and the duration of transplantation surgery. Forty-six (10.3%) patients received 2 or more grafts during the follow-up period (median, 2.8 years). Patients who underwent retransplantation had a 3.8-fold increase in the risk of death compared with those without retransplantation (P <.01). Retransplantation after an interval of greater than 30 days from the primary graft was associated with a 6.7-fold increase in the risk of death (P <.01). The survival following retransplantations performed 30 days or earlier was similar to primary transplantations. Resource utilization was higher in patients who underwent multiple consecutive transplantations, even after adjustment for the number of grafts during the hospitalization. Among cholestatic liver disease patients, poor survival following hepatic retransplantation is attributed to late retransplantations, namely those performed more than 30 days after the initial transplantation. While efforts must be made to improve the outcome following retransplantation, a more critical evaluation may be warranted for late retransplantation candidates.
Figures


References
-
- Belle SH, Beringer KC, Detre KM. Trends in liver transplantation in the United States. In: Terasaki PI, editor. Clinical Transplants. 1993. pp. 19–35. - PubMed
-
- D’Alessandro AM, Ploef RJ, Knechtle SJ, Pirsch JD, Stegall MD, Hoffmann R, Sollinger HW, et al. Retransplantation of the liver—a seven year experience. Transplantation. 1993;55:1083–1087. - PubMed
-
- 1997 Annual report of the U.S. Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network–Transplant Data: 1988–1996. Rockville, MD: UNOS, Richmond, VA, and the Division of Organ Transplantation, Bureau of Health Resources Development, Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services;
-
- Ubel PA, Arnold RM, Caplan AL. Rationing failure. The ethical lessons of the retransplantation of scarce vital organs. JAMA. 1993;270:2469–2474. - PubMed
-
- Powelson JA, Cosimi AB, Lewis WD, Rohrer RJ, Freeman RB, Vacanti JP, Jonas M, et al. Hepatic retransplantation in New England—a regional experience and survival model. Transplantation. 1993;55:802–806. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical