Breast cancer: computer simulation method for estimating optimal intervals for screening
- PMID: 10429717
- DOI: 10.1148/radiology.212.2.r99au49551
Breast cancer: computer simulation method for estimating optimal intervals for screening
Abstract
Purpose: To develop and evaluate a mathematic method that can be used to determine the optimal screening interval for detection of breast cancer prior to distant metastatic spread.
Materials and methods: A computer simulation was developed with the use of biologically based data from the literature on the rates of tumor growth and spread, which can be used to calculate the course of breast cancer growth and metastasis.
Results: On the basis of the data available at this time, the results of the simulations suggested that a screening interval of 2 years would result in a 22% reduction in the rate of distant metastatic disease, an interval of 1 year would result in a 51% reduction, and an interval of 6 months would result in an 80% reduction.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that more frequent screening could dramatically reduce the death rate from breast cancer.
Similar articles
-
Estimation of natural history parameters of breast cancer based on non-randomized organized screening data: subsidiary analysis of effects of inter-screening interval, sensitivity, and attendance rate on reduction of advanced cancer.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Jul;122(2):553-66. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0701-x. Epub 2010 Jan 7. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010. PMID: 20054645
-
Optimal screening schedules for prevention of metastatic cancer.Stat Med. 2013 Jan 30;32(2):206-19. doi: 10.1002/sim.5474. Epub 2012 Jul 16. Stat Med. 2013. PMID: 22807074
-
Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection?J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005;(35):39-46. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgi036. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005. PMID: 16287884
-
The effect of service screening on breast cancer mortality rates.Eur J Cancer Prev. 2008 Aug;17(4):306-11. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3282f0c0cc. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2008. PMID: 18562953
-
Retrospective reviews of breast cancer screening: what do we really learn from them?Radiology. 1996 Jun;199(3):615-20. doi: 10.1148/radiology.199.3.8637974. Radiology. 1996. PMID: 8637974 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
[Radiological diagnosis of mammary carcinomas. I: pathology and x-ray mammography].Radiologe. 2004 May;44(5):517-38; quiz 539-40. doi: 10.1007/s00117-004-1060-6. Radiologe. 2004. PMID: 15250098 Review. German.
-
Comparison of 1- and 2-year screening intervals for women undergoing screening mammography.Br J Cancer. 2005 Mar 14;92(5):961-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602393. Br J Cancer. 2005. PMID: 15714210 Free PMC article.
-
Family history of cancer and its association with breast cancer risk perception and repeat mammography.Am J Public Health. 2012 Dec;102(12):2322-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300786. Epub 2012 Oct 18. Am J Public Health. 2012. PMID: 23078489 Free PMC article.
-
Potential Early Markers for Breast Cancer: A Proteomic Approach Comparing Saliva and Serum Samples in a Pilot Study.Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 19;24(4):4164. doi: 10.3390/ijms24044164. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 36835577 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating Tumor Growth Rates In Vivo.Bull Math Biol. 2015 Oct;77(10):1934-54. doi: 10.1007/s11538-015-0110-8. Bull Math Biol. 2015. PMID: 26481497 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical