Community health report cards. Results of a national survey
- PMID: 10429757
- DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00033-1
Community health report cards. Results of a national survey
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this research is to examine the state-of-the-art in community health report card development and use in order to increase their effective integration into community health improvement efforts.
Methods: A mailed survey was sent to 115 "report card" communities nationwide. This list was generated through multiple key informants at the national, regional, and state levels. Seventy-four percent (85/115) were eligible for the study. The report cards returned were inventoried for: quality of their data, comprehensiveness, presentation, appropriateness to target audiences, purpose and sponsorship, relevance to policy development, community involvement, comparability, replicability, and other factors.
Results: Of the 85 eligible projects, 65 responded. The report cards varied significantly in all areas. Only one half of communities used pre-existing formats or the experience of others to guide this resource-intensive development process. Data collection was the greatest challenge encountered in development. Local health departments, hospitals, and non-profit civic groups were the community groups most likely to be involved in development.
Conclusion: There is need for infrastructure, technical assistance, and improved, easy-to-use tools to facilitate the report card development process and the sharing of expertise and experience among involved communities. Greater systematization of the process would enhance the reasonableness and sustainability of the effort. Broad community involvement, including support of the local health department, other community agencies, as well as the local business community, may be key to their success.
Similar articles
-
The role of public health in population health.Physician Exec. 1997 Sep-Oct;23(7):25-9. Physician Exec. 1997. PMID: 10170418
-
A community health report card: comprehensive assessment for tracking community health (CATCH).Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc. 1997 Sep-Oct;2(5):196-207. Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc. 1997. PMID: 9450407
-
Improving community health status: strategies for success.Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 1996 Feb;8(1):2-12. Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 1996. PMID: 10154828 No abstract available.
-
Community coalition building--contemporary practice and research: introduction.Am J Community Psychol. 2001 Apr;29(2):165-72; discussion 205-11. doi: 10.1023/A:1010314326787. Am J Community Psychol. 2001. PMID: 11446274 Review.
-
A practitioner's guide to successful coalitions.Am J Community Psychol. 2001 Apr;29(2):173-91; discussion 205-11. doi: 10.1023/A:1010366310857. Am J Community Psychol. 2001. PMID: 11446275 Review.
Cited by
-
Using routine comparative data to assess the quality of health care: understanding and avoiding common pitfalls.Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Apr;12(2):122-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.2.122. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003. PMID: 12679509 Free PMC article.
-
Meeting the data needs of a local health department: the Los Angeles County Health Survey.Am J Public Health. 2001 Dec;91(12):1950-2. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.12.1950. Am J Public Health. 2001. PMID: 11726372 Free PMC article.
-
Creating a community report card: the San Diego experience.Am J Public Health. 2000 Jun;90(6):880-2. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.6.880. Am J Public Health. 2000. PMID: 10877729 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Grading and reporting health and health disparities.Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Jan;7(1):A16. Epub 2009 Dec 15. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010. PMID: 20040231 Free PMC article.
-
Starting school healthy and ready to learn: using social indicators to improve school readiness in Los Angeles County.Prev Chronic Dis. 2007 Oct;4(4):A106. Epub 2007 Sep 15. Prev Chronic Dis. 2007. PMID: 17875250 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources