Clinical and dermatoscopic diagnosis of malignant melanoma. Assessed by expert and non-expert groups
- PMID: 10429989
- DOI: 10.1080/000155599750010715
Clinical and dermatoscopic diagnosis of malignant melanoma. Assessed by expert and non-expert groups
Abstract
We investigated the nosographic and diagnostic probabilities and likelihood ratios of dermatoscopy in order to evaluate the method's role in decision-making regarding melanoma. Clinical slides and dermatoscopic photos were obtained from 232 patients referred for dermatoscopy. Four dermatoscopy "experts" and 5 "non-experts" assessed the slides. Diagnoses were compared with histopathology. Sensitivity of the clinical assessments was 0.78 vs. 0.69 ("experts" vs. "non-experts"), sensitivity of dermatoscopy assessment was 0.83 vs. 0.69 (p = 0.04). The expert group demonstrated increased specificity (from 0.89 to 0.94) when applying dermatoscopy compared with clinical assessment alone (p=0.03). Positive likelihood ratios were doubled in the "expert group" and the negative likelihood ratios improved 25% with dermatoscopy compared with clinical assessment.
Similar articles
-
Dermatoscopy: usefulness in the differential diagnosis of cutaneous pigmentary lesions.Melanoma Res. 1994 Dec;4(6):391-4. doi: 10.1097/00008390-199412000-00008. Melanoma Res. 1994. PMID: 7703719
-
Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of dermatoscopy in detecting malignant melanoma.Med J Aust. 1997 Aug 18;167(4):206-10. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1997.tb138847.x. Med J Aust. 1997. PMID: 9293268
-
The dermatoscopic ABCD rule does not improve diagnostic accuracy of malignant melanoma.Acta Derm Venereol. 1999 Nov;79(6):469-72. doi: 10.1080/000155599750009942. Acta Derm Venereol. 1999. PMID: 10598764
-
Comparison of classical dermatoscopy and acrylic globe magnifier dermatoscopy.Acta Derm Venereol. 2008;88(2):139-42. doi: 10.2340/00015555-0374. Acta Derm Venereol. 2008. PMID: 18311441
-
Dermatoscopy in the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions: a new semiology for the dermatologist.J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2000 Sep;14(5):353-69. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-3083.2000.00122.x. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2000. PMID: 11305377 Review.
Cited by
-
Skin Cancer Classification With Deep Learning: A Systematic Review.Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 13;12:893972. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.893972. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35912265 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Visual inspection for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 4;12(12):CD013194. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013194. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30521684 Free PMC article.
-
Visual inspection and dermoscopy, alone or in combination, for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 4;12(12):CD011901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011901.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30521688 Free PMC article.
-
Dermoscopy, with and without visual inspection, for diagnosing melanoma in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 4;12(12):CD011902. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011902.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30521682 Free PMC article.
-
The role of spectrophotometry in the diagnosis of melanoma.BMC Dermatol. 2010 Aug 13;10:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-5945-10-5. BMC Dermatol. 2010. PMID: 20707921 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical