Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Apr;83(4):486-94.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.4.486.

Immunolocalisation of the VEGF receptors FLT-1, KDR, and FLT-4 in diabetic retinopathy

Affiliations

Immunolocalisation of the VEGF receptors FLT-1, KDR, and FLT-4 in diabetic retinopathy

G Smith et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Apr.

Abstract

Aim: To determine the spatial and temporal changes in the staining pattern of the VEGF receptors FLT-1, KDR, and the putative receptor FLT-4 during the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy.

Methods: Immunohistochemical localisation of VEGF receptors, using antibodies against FLT-1, FLT-4, and KDR, was carried out on specimens of normal human retina (n = 10), diabetic retinas (a) with no overt retinopathy (n = 12), (b) with intraretinal vascular abnormalities but no proliferative retinopathy (n = 5), (c) with active proliferative retinopathy (n = 6), and (d) with no residual proliferative retinopathy after scatter photocoagulation therapy (n = 14), and surgically excised diabetic fibrovascular membranes (n = 11). The degree and pattern of immunostaining was recorded.

Results: FLT-1 staining was apparent in the retinas from both non-diabetic and diabetic retinas; weak to moderate staining was generally confined to the inner nuclear layer, the ganglion cell layer, and the retinal vessels during all stages of the disease process. Staining of the retinal vessels was raised in diabetic tissue compared with non-diabetic tissue. The preretinal vessels of the diabetic subjects stained moderately to intensely for FLT-1. In contrast with FLT-1 staining minimal immunostaining for KDR was demonstrated in the non-diabetic eyes and the unlasered eyes; however, weak staining for KDR was observed in the inner nuclear layer and the ganglion cell layer of the unlasered eyes with diabetic changes. In those retinas with preretinal neovascularisation KDR immunoreactivity was moderate to intense in the intra- and preretinal vessels. However, in the excised membranes, where the vessels may have been in a quiescent state, the levels of KDR were weak to moderate. After apparently successful laser treatment KDR staining was reduced in the intraretinal vessels. Minimal FLT-4 staining was observed throughout normal eyes while weak to moderate FLT-4 staining was generally confined to the inner nuclear layer and the ganglion cell layer of the unlasered diabetic eyes. Weak to moderate levels of FLT-4 staining were observed in the intraretinal vessels except after apparently successful laser treatment where reduced levels of staining were observed. Weak to moderate staining was observed in the preretinal vessels.

Conclusions: This study supports a role for FLT-1, KDR, and possibly FLT-4 in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy; however, their specific roles in the progression of the disease may differ.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Photomicrographs demonstrating FLT-1 immunostaining of non-diabetic retina (A), diabetic retina with no obvious retinopathy (B), diabetic retina with obvious intraretinal vascular changes but no evidence of PDR (C), the same retina stained with GFAP (D), diabetic retina with PDR (E, F, G), diabetic retina post laser but with no residual PDR (H). Immunostaining for FLT-1 was greatest in the diabetic tissue compared with non-diabetic tissue. Increased staining was generally confined to the inner nuclear layer and the ganglion cell layer. Magnification A, G ×94; B, C, E ×118; D ×156; F ×378; H ×236.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Photomicrographs demonstrating FLT-1 immunostaining of an excised fibrovascular membrane (A). Immunoreactivity for FLT-1 was abolished in a control specimen of excised membrane processed with omission of the primary antibody (B) and GFAP staining of the same excised membrane (C). Intense staining was observed around the vessels in excised membranes. Magnification A, B, C ×60.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Photomicrographs demonstrating KDR immunostaining of non-diabetic retina (A), diabetic retina with PDR (B, C), the same retina stained with GFAP (D), and diabetic retina post laser but with no residual PDR (E). Immunostaining for KDR was greatest in the diabetic tissue with PDR and was minimal in most other diabetic tissue. Interestingly, immunostaining in the diabetic retinas which had undergone apparently successful laser treatment was reduced compared with the staining intensity in the retinas with PDR. Immunoreactivity for KDR was abolished in a control specimen of PDR retina processed with omission of the primary antibody (F). Magnification = A, C, D ×156; B ×60; E ×118; F ×78.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Photomicrographs demonstrating FLT-4 staining of normal retina (A), diabetic retina with obvious vascular intraretinal changes but no evidence of PDR (B), diabetic retina with PDR (C, D) and the same retina stained with GFAP (E). Immunostaining for FLT-4 was raised in diabetic tissue compared with non-diabetic tissue. Immunostaining was intermediate in the PDR specimens. Immunoreactivity for FLT-4 was abolished in a control specimen of PDR retina processed with omission of the primary antibody (F). Magnification A, D ×156; B ×118; C ×94; E, F ×60.

References

    1. J Immunol. 1995 Mar 15;154(6):2801-7 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jan 31;92(3):905-9 - PubMed
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 Apr 5;87(7):506-16 - PubMed
    1. Growth Factors. 1994;11(3):187-95 - PubMed
    1. Lab Invest. 1995 Jun;72(6):615-8 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances