Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 Aug 15;94(4):1209-17.

Prednisone response is the strongest predictor of treatment outcome in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Affiliations
  • PMID: 10438708
Free article
Clinical Trial

Prednisone response is the strongest predictor of treatment outcome in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia

M Dördelmann et al. Blood. .
Free article

Abstract

To define prognostic factors in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the outcome of 106 infants (age </=12 months) during 3 consecutive multicenter trials of the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster group (ALL-BFM 83, 86, and 90) was retrospectively analyzed according to presenting features and early in vivo response to prednisone. The prednisone response was defined as the cytoreduction (number of blood blasts per microliter at day 8) to a 7-day prednisone prephase and 1 intrathecal dose of methotrexate on day 1. Prednisone good responder (PGR; <1,000 blasts/microL) received conventional therapy and prednisone poor responder (PPR; >/=1,000 blasts/microL) received intensified therapy. Infant ALL was characterized by a high incidence of a white blood cell count greater than 100 x 10(3)/microL (57%), central nervous system leukemia (24%), lack of CD10 expression (59%), 11q23 rearrangement (49%) including the translocation t(4;11) (29%), and a comparatively high proportion of PPR (26%), which were all significantly associated with inferior outcome by univariate analysis. The estimated probability for an event-free survival at 6 years (pEFS) was by far better for PGR compared with PPR, who had a dismal prognosis despite intensified treatment (pEFS, 53% +/- 6% v 15% +/- 7%, P =.0001). Infant PGR, who were less than 6 months of age (n = 40), lacked CD10 expression (n = 43), and/or had an 11q23 rearrangement (n = 17) fared significantly better compared with corresponding PPR, as indicated by a pEFS of 44% +/- 8%, 49% +/- 8%, and 41% +/- 12%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, PPR was the strongest adverse prognostic factor (relative risk, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 5.8; P <.0001). Infants with PGR, comprising a major subgroup (74%) among infants, might successfully be treated with conventional therapy, whereas PPR require new therapeutic strategies, including early treatment intensification or bone marrow transplantation in first remission.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources