An analysis of item gains and losses in retroactive interference
- PMID: 10439504
- DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.25.4.978
An analysis of item gains and losses in retroactive interference
Abstract
The repeated-testing paradigm is used to study both retroactive interference and hypermnesia (the improvement in memory across repeated tests). Considerable theoretical progress has been made by separately analyzing the 2 components of hypermnesia: the recovery of previously unrecalled items on later tests (item gains) and the forgetting of previously recalled items on later tests (item losses). Item gains increase with increases in item-specific processing, whereas item losses decrease with increases in relational processing. The authors suggest that separate analysis of item gains and losses in retroactive interference research may also prove fruitful. Three experiments showed that an interpolated list affects item gains but not losses, whereas processing similarity between the target and interpolated lists affects losses but not gains. These results are interpreted within the relational-item-specific processing framework.
Similar articles
-
Rate of forgetting in amnesia: II. Recall and recognition of word lists at different levels of organization.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999 Jul;25(4):963-77. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.25.4.963. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999. PMID: 10439503
-
An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Mar;32(2):277-89. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.277. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006. PMID: 16569146
-
Using cumulative-recall curves to assess the extent of relational and item-specific processing.Memory. 2005 Feb;13(2):189-99. doi: 10.1080/09608210344000670. Memory. 2005. PMID: 15847230
-
Rate of forgetting in amnesia: I. Recall and recognition of prose.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999 Jul;25(4):942-62. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.25.4.942. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999. PMID: 10439502 Review.
-
Memory deficit after closed head injury.J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1990 Jan;12(1):129-53. doi: 10.1080/01688639008400960. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1990. PMID: 2406280 Review.
Cited by
-
Memory for actions: item and relational information in categorized lists.Psychol Res. 2004 Dec;69(1-2):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0160-7. Epub 2003 Dec 23. Psychol Res. 2004. PMID: 14691724
-
Unannounced memory tests are not necessarily unexpected by participants: test expectation and its consequences in the repeated test paradigm.Cogn Process. 2015 Aug;16(3):269-78. doi: 10.1007/s10339-015-0663-3. Epub 2015 Jun 19. Cogn Process. 2015. PMID: 26085107
-
Disentangling encoding versus retrieval explanations of the bizarreness effect: implications for distinctiveness.Mem Cognit. 2005 Mar;33(2):270-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03195316. Mem Cognit. 2005. PMID: 16028582
-
Retroactive interference from translation equivalents: implications for first language forgetting.Mem Cognit. 2001 Mar;29(2):312-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03194925. Mem Cognit. 2001. PMID: 11352214
-
Falsely recalled items are rich in item-specific information.Mem Cognit. 2007 Oct;35(7):1630-40. doi: 10.3758/bf03193497. Mem Cognit. 2007. PMID: 18062541
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources