An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences
- PMID: 10442024
An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences
Abstract
Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were used to investigate how and when a semantic factor (animacy) affects the early analysis of a difficult syntactic structure, namely, object relative sentences. We contrasted electrophysiological and behavioral responses to two object relative types that were syntactically and lexically identical and varied only in the order of the component animate and inanimate nouns [Inanimate (Animate) vs. Animate (Inanimate)]. ERPs were recorded from 40 subjects to each word of 30 I(A) and 30 A(I) sentences that occurred randomly among a set of various other sentence types read for comprehension. ERP effects to the early noun animacy manipulation were observed beginning with the initial noun and extending past the main clause verbs. We interpret the timing and multitude of electrophysiological effects, including the N400, P600, and left-anterior negativity, as evidence that both semantic and syntactic, and perhaps other types of information, are used early during structural analysis and message-level computations as needed for comprehension.
Similar articles
-
Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Aug 15;15(6):883-99. doi: 10.1162/089892903322370807. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003. PMID: 14511541
-
Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Mar;19(1):59-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.022. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004. PMID: 14972359
-
Is animacy special? ERP correlates of semantic violations and animacy violations in sentence processing.Brain Res. 2011 Jan 12;1368:208-21. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.10.070. Epub 2010 Oct 26. Brain Res. 2011. PMID: 21029726
-
Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: challenges to syntax.Brain Res. 2007 May 18;1146:23-49. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.063. Epub 2006 Dec 23. Brain Res. 2007. PMID: 17400197 Review.
-
Word and world order: semantic, phonological, and metrical determinants of serial position.Cogn Psychol. 1993 Apr;25(2):188-230. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1993.1005. Cogn Psychol. 1993. PMID: 8482072 Review.
Cited by
-
How the emotional content of discourse affects language comprehension.PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033718. Epub 2012 Mar 29. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22479432 Free PMC article.
-
About Edible Restaurants: Conflicts between Syntax and Semantics as Revealed by ERPs.Front Psychol. 2010 Dec 17;1:222. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00222. eCollection 2010. Front Psychol. 2010. PMID: 21833277 Free PMC article.
-
When the Second Language Takes the Lead: Neurocognitive Processing Changes in the First Language of Adult Attriters.Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 30;8:389. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00389. eCollection 2017. Front Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28424634 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond Verb Meaning: Experimental Evidence for Incremental Processing of Semantic Roles and Event Structure.Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 30;8:1806. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01806. eCollection 2017. Front Psychol. 2017. PMID: 29163250 Free PMC article.
-
The Automatic but Flexible and Content-Dependent Nature of Syntax.Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Jun 11;15:651158. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.651158. eCollection 2021. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34177488 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous