Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1999 Aug;120(4):969-78.
doi: 10.1104/pp.120.4.969.

Characterization of MdMADS2, a member of the SQUAMOSA subfamily of genes, in apple

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Characterization of MdMADS2, a member of the SQUAMOSA subfamily of genes, in apple

S K Sung et al. Plant Physiol. 1999 Aug.

Abstract

A MADS-box gene, MdMADS2, was isolated from the apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) var Fuji and its developmental expression pattern was studied during flower development. MdMADS2 shares a high degree of amino acid sequence identity with the SQUAMOSA subfamily of genes. RNA blot analysis showed that MdMADS2 is transcribed through all stages of flower development, and its transcription was seen in the four floral organs. RNA in situ hybridization revealed that the MdMADS2 mRNA is expressed both in the inflorescence meristem and in the floral meristem. The MdMADS2 transcript was detected at all stages of flower development. Protein localization analysis showed that MdMADS2 protein was excluded from the stamen and carpel primordia, in which a considerable MdMADS2 mRNA signal was detected. This indicates that posttanscriptional regulation may be involved in the MdMADS2-mediated control of flower development. Transgenic tobacco expressing the MdMADS2 gene from the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter showed early flowering and shorter bolts, but did not show any homeotic changes in the floral organs. These results suggest that MdMADS2 plays an important role during early stages of flower development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of the amino acid sequence of the MdMADS2 protein with other MADS proteins in the SQUA subfamily. A, Sequence alignment of the MADS domain. Shown here are the MADS-box sequences of MdMADS2 (accession no. U78948), silver birch BpMADS5 (accession no. X99655), tomato TM4 (accession no. X60757), potato PTOM1-1 (accession no. U23757), white campion SLM5 (accession no. X80492), Arabidopsis AGL8 (accession no. U33473), white mustard SaMADSB (accession no. U25695), snapdragon SQUA (accession no. X63701), Arabidopsis AP1 (accession no. S35631), and broccoli Bio2AP1 (accession no. U67452). The asterisks represent amino acid residues identical to the corresponding residues in MdMADS2. The numbers at the left represent the positions of the first amino acid residues shown for each sequence. B, Alignment of the K domains. The asterisks and the numbers at the left are as represented in A. C, Alignment of the C-terminal regions. The last 20 amino acid residues are shown. The left numbers are the positions of the first amino acid residues shown for each sequence. The numbers at the right represent the percentage of identical amino acid residues with MdMADS2.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A, RNA blot analysis of the MdMADS2 transcript in apple flower bud. Lane 1, Mature leaves; lane 2, stage 1 bud (length = 4– 5 mm); lane 3, stage 2 bud (length = 7–8 mm); lane 4, stage 3 bud (petals begin to emerge from sepals); lane 5, mature flowers; lane 6, post-anthesis flowers; lane 7, sepals; lane 8, petals; lane 9, stamens; and lane 10, carpels of mature flower. B, rRNA stained with ethidium bromide showing the equivalence of RNA loading between the lines.
Figure 3
Figure 3
In situ hybridization patterns of MdMADS2 mRNA in a developing flower bud. Each section was photographed using a blue filter under bright-field optics. The transcript signal is blue. Bar = 300 μm. A, Stage 1 flower bud with the inflorescence meristem. The arrowhead indicates the early floral meristem emerging from the inflorescence meristem. B, Stage 2 flower bud with young flower primordia. C and D, Flower buds at early and late stage 3, respectively. Floral organs arise and differentiate at these stages. E and F, Stage 4 flower bud with fused carpels and mature flower, respectively. G through I, Hybridization with a sense probe of MdMADS2 in flower bud at stage 1 (G), stage 3 (H), and stage 4 (I). a, Anther; b, bract; c, carpel; f, filament; fp, flower primordium; ft, floral tube; g, gynoecium; im, inflorescence meristem; l, leaf appendage; o, ovule; p, petal; pc, procambium; s, style; se, sepal; st, stamen.
Figure 4
Figure 4
MdMADS2 protein expressed in E. coli and protein gel blots of MdMADS2 and other MADS proteins with affinity-purified anti-MdMADS2 antibodies. A, Coomassie Blue-stained protein gel showing truncated MdMADS2 protein expressed in E. coli. Lane M, Mr marker; lane −, before IPTG induction; lane +, after IPTG induction; lane P, purified MdMADS2 protein. B, Protein gel blots of truncated MADS proteins with affinity-purified anti-MdMADS2 antibodies. Each protein was loaded in two adjacent lanes. Md2, MdMADS2; Md3, MdMADS3; Md4, MdMADS4; Os1, OsMADS1.
Figure 5
Figure 5
In situ immunolocalization of the MdMADS2 protein in a developing flower bud. Sections were hybridized with affinity-purified anti-MdMADS2 antibodies. Sections were photographed using a blue filter under bright-field optics. The protein signal is purple. Bar = 100 μm. A, Flower bud with the inflorescence meristem (stage 1). B, Preimmune serum control for A. C, Vegetative bud with the stem meristem. D, Preimmune serum control for C. E, Flower bud at stage 2. F, Preimmune serum control for E. G, Flower bud at stage 3. H, Preimmune serum control for G. b, Bract; c, carpel primordium; im, inflorescence meristem; fp, flower primordium; l, leaf appendage; p, petal primordium; pc, procambium; rm, rib meristem; se, sepal primordium; sm, stem meristem; st, stamen primordium.
Figure 6
Figure 6
RNA blot analysis of primary transgenic tobacco plants. The numbers indicate independent transgenic tobacco lines of two different cultivars, SR1 (A) and Xanthi (B). Twenty micrograms of total RNA was isolated from mature leaves and hybridized with the 32P-labeled MdMADS2 probe. As a control, a probe prepared from the TSC29 cDNA (Gao et al., 1994) was hybridized to the same membrane after washing off the MdMADS2 probe.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Ectopic phenotypes of transgenic tobacco plant. A, Homozygous transgenic line S4 (left two plants) and wild type (right two plants) of the tobacco cv SR1. B, Homozygous transgenic line X4 (left two plants) and wild type (right two plants) of the tobacco cv Xanthi.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amasino RM. Control of flowering time in plants. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1996;6:480–487. - PubMed
    1. An G, Ebert PR, Mitra A, Ha S-B. Binary vectors. In: Gelvin SB, Schilperoort R, editors. Plant Molecular Biology Manual. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1988. , section A3, pp 1–19.
    1. Angenent GC, Busscher M, Franken J, Mol JNM, van Tunen AJ. Differential expression of two MADS box genes in wild-type and mutant petunia flowers. Plant Cell. 1992;4:983–993. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angenent GC, Franken J, Busscher M, Weiss D, van Tunen AJ. Co-suppression of the petunia homeotic gene fbp2 affects the identity of the generative meristem. Plant J. 1994;5:33–44. - PubMed
    1. Bernier G. The control of floral evocation and morphogenesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1988;39:175–219.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources