Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1999 Aug 14;319(7207):407-10.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7207.407.

Mortality associated with use of weapons in armed conflicts, wartime atrocities, and civilian mass shootings: literature review

R M Coupland  1 , D R Meddings
Affiliations
Review

Mortality associated with use of weapons in armed conflicts, wartime atrocities, and civilian mass shootings: literature review

R M Coupland et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine the implications of variation in mortality associated with use of weapons in different contexts.

Design: Literature review.

Settings: Armed conflicts and civilian mass shootings, 1929-96.

Main outcome measure: Mortality from wounds.

Results: During the fighting of war the number of people wounded is at least twice the number killed and may be 13 times as high; this ratio of the number wounded to the number killed results from the impact of a weapon system on human beings in the particular context of war. When firearms are used against people who are immobilised, in a confined space, or unable to defend themselves the wounded to killed ratio has been lower than 1 or even 0.

Conclusions: Mortality from firearms depends not only on the technology of the weapon or its ammunition but also on the context in which it is used. The increased mortality resulting from the use of firearms in situations other than war requires a complex interaction of factors explicable in terms of wound ballistics and the psychology of the user. Understanding these factors has implications for recognition of war crimes. In addition, the lethality of conventional weapons may be increased if combatants are disabled by the new non-lethal weapons beforehand; this possibility requires careful legal examination within the framework of the Geneva Conventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Coupland RM, editor. The SIrUS Project: towards a determination of which weapons cause “superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering.”. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross; 1997.
    1. Reister FA. Medical statistics in world war II. Washington, DC: Department of the Army, Office of the Surgeon General; 1975. pp. 76–79.
    1. Bellamy RF. Combat trauma overview. In: Zaitchuk R, Grande CM, editors. Anesthesia and perioperative care of the combat casualty. Falls Church, VI: Office of the Surgeon General, United States Army; 1996.
    1. Dice WH. The role of military emergency physicians in an assault operation in Panama. Ann Emerg Med. 1991;20:1336–1340. - PubMed
    1. Clyne AJ. The wounding and killing power of small-arms fire in jungle operations. J R Army Corps. 1955;101:33–38. - PubMed

MeSH terms