Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Sep;37(9):2789-92.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.9.2789-2792.1999.

Rapid slide latex agglutination test for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

Affiliations

Rapid slide latex agglutination test for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

A van Griethuysen et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Sep.

Abstract

The MRSA screen test (Denka Seiken Co., Ltd.), a commercially available, rapid (20-min) slide latex agglutination test for the determination of methicillin resistance by detection of PBP 2a in Staphylococcus aureus, was compared with the oxacillin agar screen test and PCR detection of the mecA gene. A total of 563 S. aureus isolates were tested. Two hundred ninety-six of the isolates were methicillin-susceptible isolates from cultures of blood from consecutive patients. Also, 267 methicillin-resistant isolates that comprised 248 different phage types were tested. Methicillin resistance was defined as the presence of the mecA gene. Of the 267 mecA gene-positive isolates, 263 were positive by the MRSA screen test (sensitivity, 98.5%), and all the mecA-gene negative strains were negative by the MRSA screen test (specificity, 100%). The oxacillin agar screen test detected methicillin resistance in 250 of the mecA gene-positive isolates (sensitivity, 93.6%). The sensitivity of the MRSA screen test was statistically significantly higher than the sensitivity of the oxacillin agar screen test (P < 0. 05). The MRSA screen test is a highly sensitive and specific test for the detection of methicillin resistance. Also, it offers results within half an hour and is easy to perform, which makes this test a valuable tool in the ongoing battle against methicillin-resistant S. aureus.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Chambers H F. Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:781–791. - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Neeling A J, van Leeuwen W J, Schouls L M, Schot C S, Van Veen-Rutgers A, Beunders A J, Buiting A G M, Hol C, Ligtvoet E E J, Petit P L, Sabbe L J M, van Griethuysen A J A, van Embden J D A. Resistance of staphylococci in The Netherlands: surveillance by an electronic network during 1989–1995. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998;41:93–101. - PubMed
    1. Don R H, Cox P T, Wainwright B J, Baker K, Mattick J S. ’Touchdown’ PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19:4008. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Esveld M I, de Boer A S, Notenboom A J, van Pelt W, van Leeuwen W J. Secundaire besmetting met meticillineresistente Staphylococcus aureus in Nederlandse ziekenhuizen (juli 1994–juni 1996) Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999;143:205–208. - PubMed
    1. Frebourg N B, Nouet D, Lemée L, Martin E, Lemeland J. Comparison of ATB Staph, Rapid ATB Staph, Vitek, and E-test methods for detection of oxacillin heteroresistance in staphylococci possessing mecA. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:52–57. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms