Neuroectodermal differentiation in Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors does not predict tumor behavior

Abstract

The observation that neuroectodermal differentiation imparts a worse prognosis to the Ewing family of tumors has been suggested by some studies and refuted by others. To assess whether the diagnosis of Ewing's sarcoma versus peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) affects prognosis, we analyzed tumors from 63 analogously treated pediatric and young adult patients from the National Cancer Institute and St Jude Children's Research Hospital and retrospectively compared the results with clinical outcomes. The tumors were assessed using standard light microscopy and immunohistochemical stains for neuron-specific enolase, CD57, S100 protein, neurofilament protein, and synaptophysin with or without antigen retrieval. Ultrastructural evaluation was also performed in 39 tumors. Classification was performed using Kiel criteria as well as a modified classification. Kaplan-Meier analyses, with Mantel-Haenzel evaluation of the significance of the differences, were performed separately for localized or metastatic tumors. Using the Kiel classification on a subset of 60 cases, 39 tumors qualified as PNET and 21 as Ewing's sarcoma. Using the modified classification on a subset of 61 cases, 14 were classified as PNET, 21 as atypical Ewing's sarcoma, and 26 as Ewing's sarcoma. The addition of electron microscopy to the diagnostic armamentarium significantly increased the likelihood of identifying PNET. No significant differences in event-free or overall survival were seen using either the modified or Kiel classification, regardless of the ancillary diagnostic techniques employed. In this exploratory analysis, neuroectodermal differentiation did not play a role in clinical outcome. Confirmation of this finding will require a larger, separate study of similarly treated patients, and it may not apply to older patients.