Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 Sep;86(1):162-6.
doi: 10.1006/jsre.1999.5701.

Which technique, circular stapled anastomosis or double stapling anastomosis, provides the optimal size and shape of rectal anastomotic opening?

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Which technique, circular stapled anastomosis or double stapling anastomosis, provides the optimal size and shape of rectal anastomotic opening?

S Sadahiro et al. J Surg Res. 1999 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Two types of end-to-end colorectal anastomosis using a circular stapler, circular stapled anastomosis(CSA) and double stapling anastomosis(DSA), have become the standard technique. The possibility of anastomotic openings of the DSA being smaller and somewhat distorted, because of some portion of the stapled rectal stump not being included in the anastomotic opening, was examined.

Methods: Anastomotic openings created by CSA and DSA were photographed through a sigmoidoscope, and the maximal and minimal diameters and the areas of the anastomotic openings were measured and calculated with an image analyzer. They were examined in the swine rectum immediately after surgery and were also examined in the randomized clinical cases 3 or more months after surgery.

Results: It was found that larger anastomotic openings could be created as the diameter of the anastomosed intestine and the cartridge size became wider in both methods immediately after surgery. The shape of anastomotic opening created by DSA was observed to be more oval than round immediately after surgery. The anastomotic stenosis occurred in a small number of patients in both methods within 3 months after surgery. The area of the anastomotic opening created by CSA was about 25% larger than that by DSA immediately after surgery and about 30% larger 3 or more months after surgery.

Conclusion: CSA provides a larger anastomotic opening than DSA. Anastomotic stenosis occurred in a small number of patients in both methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources