Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 Sep;58(9):530-40.
doi: 10.1136/ard.58.9.530.

No effect of bipolar interferential electrotherapy and pulsed ultrasound for soft tissue shoulder disorders: a randomised controlled trial

G J Van Der Heijden  1 , P Leffers, P J Wolters, J J Verheijden, H van Mameren, J P Houben, L M Bouter, P G Knipschild
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

No effect of bipolar interferential electrotherapy and pulsed ultrasound for soft tissue shoulder disorders: a randomised controlled trial

G J Van Der Heijden et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy of bipolar interferential electrotherapy (ET) and pulsed ultrasound (US) as adjuvants to exercise therapy for soft tissue shoulder disorders (SD).

Methods: Randomised placebo controlled trial with a two by two factorial design plus an additional control group in 17 primary care physiotherapy practices in the south of the Netherlands. Patients with shoulder pain and/or restricted shoulder mobility, because of a soft tissue impairment without underlying specific or generalised condition, were enrolled if they had not recovered after six sessions of exercise therapy in two weeks. They were randomised to receive (1) active ET plus active US; (2) active ET plus dummy US; (3) dummy ET plus active US; (4) dummy ET plus dummy US; or (5) no adjuvants. Additionally, they received a maximum of 12 sessions of exercise therapy in six weeks. Measurements at baseline, 6 weeks and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months later were blinded for treatment.

Outcome measures: recovery, functional status, chief complaint, pain, clinical status, and range of motion.

Results: After written informed consent 180 patients were randomised: both the active treatments were given to 73 patients, both the dummy treatments to 72 patients, and 35 patients received no adjuvants. Prognosis of groups appeared similar at baseline. Blinding was successfully maintained. At six weeks seven patients (20%) without adjuvants reported very large improvement (including complete recovery), 17 (23%) and 16 (22%) with active and dummy ET, and 19 (26%) and 14 (19%) with active and dummy US. These proportions increased to about 40% at three months, but remained virtually stable thereafter. Up to 12 months follow up the 95% CI for differences between groups for all outcomes include zero.

Conclusion: Neither ET nor US prove to be effective as adjuvants to exercise therapy for soft tissue SD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Jul;(304):68-73 - PubMed
    1. Physiother Can. 1995 Winter;47(1):30-4 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 May;48(5):691-704 - PubMed
    1. Pain. 1995 Oct;63(1):85-91 - PubMed
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 1995 Dec;54(12):959-64 - PubMed