Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1998 Sep-Oct;32(5):1247-59.

[Lumbar interbody fusion. Biomechanical significance for the spine]

[Article in Polish]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 10463237
Review

[Lumbar interbody fusion. Biomechanical significance for the spine]

[Article in Polish]
A Maciejczak et al. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 1998 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

The authors discuss the significance of interbody fusion for early and long term stability of the lumbar spine. They stress that the aim of the modern spinal instrumentation is to promote bone healing and not to replace fusion. Without fusion every stabilization device will fail in fatigue. The biomechanics of different types of spinal fusion and biomechanical conditions at fusion site are discussed. A history of lumbar interbody fusion including threaded implants (cages) is presented. Interbody cages combine positive properties of tricortical bone graft: the strength of cortical to the bone with improved incorporation properties of cancellous bone. In contrast bone graft their biomechanical performance is far better: they increase strength and stability of osteosynthesis, do not go collapse and resorption, prevent from decrease in disc space height and kyphotic angulation of the fused motion segment, require less bone to achieve fusion. They can be used solely without support of any stabilization system. Preliminary experience in fusion with interbody threaded implants suggest significant efficacy of this method.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by