Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Sep 1;86(5):858-65.
doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990901)86:5<858::aid-cncr23>3.0.co;2-8.

Chromogranin A, neuron specific enolase, carcinoembryonic antigen, and hydroxyindole acetic acid evaluation in patients with neuroendocrine tumors

Affiliations

Chromogranin A, neuron specific enolase, carcinoembryonic antigen, and hydroxyindole acetic acid evaluation in patients with neuroendocrine tumors

E Bajetta et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Chromogranin A (CgA), neuron specific enolase (NSE), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and urinary 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid (5-HIAA) are the markers currently used in the diagnosis, prognosis, and follow-up of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The authors examined the role of such biomarkers in a large series of patients with NETs.

Methods: One hundred and twenty-seven patients entered the study. Multiple blood and 24-hour urine specimens were assayed for biomarker quantitation.

Results: The accuracy of each marker was assessed in patients with (n = 106) and without (n = 21) disease. CgA proved to be the best marker (specificity of 85.7% and sensitivity of 67.9%). Patients with disease had significantly higher CgA and NSE levels compared with disease free patients (P = 0.00003 and P = 0.00240, respectively). NSE and 5-HIAA determination showed a very high specificity (100%) but a rather low sensitivity (32.9% and 35.1%, respectively). CEA was found to have little diagnostic value (sensitivity of 15.4%). CgA was the most sensitive marker for detecting patients with disseminated disease and 5-HIAA displayed the highest sensitivity in identifying syndromic patients. Tumor marker modifications were studied during follow-up. In particular, rises in CgA were associated with progressive disease in 83.3% of cases and stable CgA was associated with stable disease in 53.8% of cases. The relation between CgA modifications and liver lesions during follow-up also was studied; increases in CgA levels were associated with local progression in 100% of cases and stable marker levels were found in 68.7% of the patients with unchanged lesions.

Conclusions: The results of the current study demonstrate that CgA has the highest accuracy and is the most reliable biomarker reflecting the clinical evolution of NETs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources