Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Aug 31;96(18):10344-8.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10344.

Bacterial inactivation by using near- and supercritical carbon dioxide

Affiliations

Bacterial inactivation by using near- and supercritical carbon dioxide

A K Dillow et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

The three most common methods of sterilization in use today are ethylene oxide exposure, gamma-irradiation, and steam sterilization. Each of these methods has serious limitations for the sterilization of some materials used in medicine, especially thermally and hydrolytically sensitive polymers by themselves and in combination with proteins. In this work, we demonstrate a potential new method of sterilization by using supercritical fluid carbon dioxide. Using this method we achieve complete inactivation of a wide variety of bacterial organisms at moderate temperatures and in the absence of organic solvents or irradiation. Sterilization is a function of both the proximity to the fluid's critical point and the chemical nature of the fluid itself. When biodegradable polymers poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid and polylactic acid were included in the sterilization process, there was no effect on the inactivation efficiency, yet no physical or chemical damage to these thermally and hydrolytically labile materials was observed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of SCF sterilization apparatus. (1) CO2 cylinder. (2) Syringe pump. (3) Pump header cooler and heater. (4) Preheating coil. (5) Heater. (6) Extraction vessel. (7) Water bath.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Sterilization kinetics of E. coli in SCF CO2 in the presence of water. (B) Comparison of sterilization kinetics of E. coli in the presence and absence of water at 34°C and 140 bar. (Solid lines indicate trends only.)
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) PLGA microsphere before (Left) and after (Right) sterilization at 25°C and 205 bar for 1 hr. (B Upper) S. aureus before (Left) and after (Right) SCF-sterilization process. (Lower) P. aeruginosa before (Left) and after (Right) SCF process. (C) E. coli before (Left) and after (Right) SCF sterilization.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Fourier transform IR spectroscopy analysis of unprocessed and SCF-sterilized PLGA (t = 34°C, P = 205 bar).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clarke C P, Davidson W L, Johnson J B. J Surg. 1966;36:53–56. - PubMed
    1. Nair P D. J Biomat Appl. 1995;10:121–135. - PubMed
    1. Guidoin R, Snyder R, King M, Martin L, Botzko K, Awad J, Marios M. Biomaterials. 1985;6:122–128. - PubMed
    1. Clayton J L. Minimally Invasive Surg Nursing. 1996;10:13–20. - PubMed
    1. Konig C, Ruffieux K, Wintermantel E, Blasser J. J Biomed Mater Res Appl Biomat. 1997;38:115–119. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources