Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Sep;117(3):540-9.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1999.00986.x.

Colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) expression in the uteroplacental unit of mice with spontaneous and induced pregnancy loss

Affiliations

Colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) expression in the uteroplacental unit of mice with spontaneous and induced pregnancy loss

M Gorivodsky et al. Clin Exp Immunol. 1999 Sep.

Abstract

CSF-1 plays an important role in female reproduction and normal embryo development. To understand further CSF-1 function in normal and, especially, in compromised pregnancy, we studied the pattern of its mRNA expression as well as expression of its receptor (c-fms) in the uteroplacental units of mice with induced (cyclophosphamide (CY)-treated) and spontaneous (CBA/J x DBA/2J mating combination) pregnancy loss. RNase protection analysis demonstrated the presence of two forms of CSF-1 mRNA in the uteroplacental unit corresponding to 1400- and 263-bp protective fragments. Densitometric analysis demonstrated that the level of 1400-bp mRNA form was decreased by 40% in the uteroplacental units of mice with CY-induced pregnancy loss compared with the control mice. About 20% decrease in 263-bp protective fragment was registered in resorbing versus non-resorbed placenta of CBA/J females mated to DBA/2J males. As judged by in situ hybridization assay, CSF-1 mRNA transcripts were localized in the uterine epithelium and stroma, while c-fms mRNA was found mainly in the trophoblast. The number of metrial gland cells as well as the number of uterine leucocytes expressing CSF-1 and c-fms mRNAs was substantially lower in the uteroplacental unit of mice with pregnancy loss than in control animals. Maternal immunostimulation, while significantly decreasing the resorption rate in mice with CY-induced pregnancy loss, also strengthened CSF-1 mRNA expression at the fetomaternal interface and resulted in reconstitution in the number of CSF-1+ uterine leucocytes and metrial gland cells. These data suggest a role for uterine CSF-1 in the physiology of normal and compromised pregnancy and demonstrate a possible involvement of CSF-1-associated signalling in mechanisms of placenta and endometrium repair following immunopotentiation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
RNase protection analysis of CSF-1 mRNA in the uteroplacental unit of cyclophosphamide (CY)-treated ICR mice. Top: hybridization with CSF-1-specific anti-sense RNA probe. Lane 1, undigested CSF-1 riboprobe; lane 2, yeast tRNA used as negative control; lane 3, uteroplacental unit from control mice; lane 4, non-resorbed uteroplacental unit from CY-treated mice; lane 5, resorbing uteroplacental unit from CY-treated mice; lane 6, non-resorbed uteroplacental unit from immunopotentiated CY-treated mice. Middle: hybridization with β-actin-specific riboprobe (250 bp protected fragment). Bottom: densitometry analysis of protected fragment corresponding to 1400 bp. CY, Non-resorbed uteroplacental unit from mice treated with CY; R, resorbing uteroplacental unit from mice treated with CY; IM + CY, non-resorbed uteroplacental unit from immunopotentiated CY-treated mice. To evaluate results of RNase protection assay statistically, four samples obtained from different litters were analysed.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
RNase protection analysis of CSF-1 mRNA in the uteroplacental unit of CBA/J mice. Top: hybridization with CSF-1-specific RNA probe. Lane 1, undigested CSF-1 riboprobe; lane 2, yeast tRNA negative control; lane 3, non-resorbed uteroplacental unit from CBA/J × DBA/2J mouse combination; lane 4, resorbing uteroplacental unit from CBA/J × DBA/2J mouse combination. Middle: hybridization with β-actin-specific riboprobe (250 bp protected fragment). Bottom: densitometry analysis of RNA blots. Five samples were analysed to evaluate results of RNase protection assay statistically.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Distribution of CSF-1 and c-fms mRNAs in placentas and uteri of cyclophosphamide (CY)-treated ICR mice. (a) Expression of CSF-1 mRNA in the uterus of CY-treated mice The positive signal is detected in stromal cells and muscle cells of uterine vasculature (b) Leucocytes in necrotic zone in the resorbing uteroplacental unit of CY-treated mice demonstrate no expression of CSF-1 mRNA. (c) c-fms mRNA expression in giant cells in the placenta of CY-treated mice. (d) Strong positive signal for c-fms mRNA in leucocytes infiltrating necrotic zone of the resorbing uteroplacental unit of CY-treated mice. (e,f) CSF-1 mRNA expression in the uterine epithelium of non-immunopotentiated (e) and immunopotentiated (f) CY-treated mice. (g) Negative control—a placental section of CY-treated mice hybridized with non-homologous RNA (× 100).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of c-fms mRNA. Top: (a) Lanes 1 and 2, uteroplacental unit of control mice. Cyclophosphamide (CY)-treated mice: lanes 3 and 4, non-resorbed placenta; lanes 5 and 6, resorbing placenta; lanes 7 and 8, placenta of immunopotentiated control mice; lanes 9 and 10, placenta of immunopotentiated and CY-treated mice. Lanes 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 demonstrate negative controls for RT-PCR in which reverse transcriptase was omitted. (b) CBA/J × DBA/2J mating combination. Lanes 1 and 2, non-resorbed placenta; lanes 3 and 4, resorbing placenta. Lanes 2 and 4 represent negative controls. Bottom: (a,b) RT-PCR with β-actin-specific primers.

References

    1. Wegmann TG. The cytokine basis for cross-talk between the maternal immune and reproductive systems. Curr Opin Immunol. 1990;2:765–9. - PubMed
    1. Toder V, Shomer B. The role of lymphokines in pregnancy. Immunol Allerg Clin N Am. 1990;10:65–69.
    1. Stanley ER, Guilbert LJ, Tushinsky RJ, Bartelmez SH. CSF-1—a mononuclear phagocyte lineage-specific hemopoietic growth factor. J Cell Biochem. 1983;21:151–9. - PubMed
    1. De M, Sanford T, Wood GW. Relationship between macrophage colony-stimulating factor production by uterine epithelial cells and accumulation and distribution of macrophages in the uterus of pregnant mice. J Leukoc Biol. 1993;53:240–8. - PubMed
    1. Bartocci A, Pollard JW, Stanley ER. Regulation of colony stimulating factor 1 during pregnancy. J Exp Med. 1986;164:956–61. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances