Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999;11(4):232-9.
doi: 10.1053/clon.1999.9055.

Survey of attitudes of UK clinical oncologists towards radionuclide therapy

Affiliations

Survey of attitudes of UK clinical oncologists towards radionuclide therapy

N P Rowell. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1999.

Abstract

A survey of UK consultants in clinical oncology was carried out in November 1997. The aim of this was to explore their attitudes towards radionuclide therapy and to determine the proportion of clinical oncologists involved in this modality. Three hundred and twenty-eight questionnaires were sent out and 227 (69.2%) were returned. Approximately one-half of those responding treat thyroid cancer or benign thyroid disease with radioactive iodine ((131)I) or prostate cancer with strontium ((89)Sr). The median number of patients treated per year with (131)I for benign thyroid disease was 12, with evidence of increasing subspecialization. Treatment with radioactive phosphorus ((32)P) for haematological disorders and yttrium ((90)Y) for intra-articular conditions was carried out by 31% (median number treated per year, two) and 6% (median number per year, five) respectively. There was strong support for the continuing involvement of clinical oncologists in radionuclide therapy for thyroid and prostate cancer. There was significant support for patients with benign thyroid disease or requiring intra-articular (90)Y to be treated by a specialist in nuclear medicine. However, this support was less strong amongst those currently involved in treatment compared with those not involved. There was support for the continued involvement of clinical oncologists in the use of (32)P. Attitudes appeared not to vary in different parts of the UK.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Radionuclide therapy.
    Buchanan RB, Lewington VJ. Buchanan RB, et al. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1999;11(4):219-20. doi: 10.1053/clon.1999.9051. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1999. PMID: 10473715 No abstract available.