Comparison of frictional resistance in titanium and stainless steel brackets
- PMID: 10474098
- DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70237-4
Comparison of frictional resistance in titanium and stainless steel brackets
Abstract
This study measures and compares the level of frictional resistance generated between titanium and stainless steel brackets. Both 0.018 and 0.022 inch slot size edgewise brackets were tested with different sized rectangular stainless steel wires in a specially designed apparatus. The frictional resistance was measured on Instron Universal testing machine (Instron Corp, Canton, Mass) with a 10 pound load cell. The specimen population was composed of 180 brackets and 180 wire specimens. A completely randomized design (one way) ANOVA was used to test for significant differences among the three bracket/wire types in the 0.018 and 0.022 inch slot sizes. This was followed by the Student Newman Keuls Multiple Comparison of means ranking at P < .05 to determine differences between the different groups. The titanium brackets showed lower static and kinetic frictional force as the wire size increased, whereas stainless steel brackets showed higher static and kinetic frictional force as the wire size increased.
Similar articles
-
Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.Aust Orthod J. 2004 May;20(1):25-30. Aust Orthod J. 2004. PMID: 15233584
-
Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011 Mar 1;12(2):91-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1015. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011. PMID: 22186750
-
Relative kinetic frictional forces between sintered stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jan;107(1):20-7. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70153-2. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995. PMID: 7817958
-
Coefficients of friction for arch wires in stainless steel and polycrystalline alumina bracket slots. I. The dry state.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Oct;98(4):300-12. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81487-8. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990. PMID: 2220691 Review.
-
On bracket slot height: a methodologic study.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Apr;113(4):387-93. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)80009-7. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998. PMID: 9563353 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of the frictional resistance between archwire and different bracket system: An in vitro study.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2014 Jul;6(Suppl 1):S150-5. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.137429. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2014. PMID: 25210359 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of sliding velocity on friction: an in vitro study at extremely low sliding velocity approximating orthodontic tooth movement.Angle Orthod. 2014 May;84(3):451-8. doi: 10.2319/060513-427.1. Epub 2013 Oct 25. Angle Orthod. 2014. PMID: 24160997 Free PMC article.
-
Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations.J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 Jun;22(3):228-34. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720130665. J Appl Oral Sci. 2014. PMID: 25025564 Free PMC article.
-
Frictional resistance exerted by different lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study.Prog Orthod. 2013 Oct 18;14:37. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-37. Prog Orthod. 2013. PMID: 24325847 Free PMC article.
-
Static and kinetic frictional forces of silica-insert ceramic brackets with coated archwires in artificial saliva.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2017 Nov-Dec;14(6):412-417. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.218567. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2017. PMID: 29238380 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources