Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Jun;20(3):275-86.
doi: 10.1023/a:1009905523228.

The (gendered) construction of diagnosis interpretation of medical signs in women patients

Affiliations

The (gendered) construction of diagnosis interpretation of medical signs in women patients

K Malterud. Theor Med Bioeth. 1999 Jun.

Abstract

Medicine maintains a distinction between the medical symptom--the patient's "subjective" experience and expression, and the privileged medical sign--the "objective" findings observable by the doctor. Although the distinction is not consistently applied, it becomes clearly visible in the "undefined," medically unexplained disorders of women patients. Potential impacts of genderized interaction on the interpretation of medical signs are addressed by re-reading the diagnostic process as a matter of social construction, where diagnosis results from human interpretation within a sociopolitical context. The discussion is illustrated by a case story and empirical evidence of the gendering in the doctor-patient relationship. The theoretical analysis is supported by semiotic perspectives of bodily signs, feminist theory on experience, and Foucault's ideas about medical perception and gaze, and concludes that a medical diagnosis is seldom a biological fact, but the outcome of a process where biological, cultural and social elements are interwoven. Further deconstruction of the chain of signs from a feminist perspective, assigning validity to the voice of the woman patient, might broaden the understanding of women's health, illness and disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Theor Med. 1986 Jun;7(2):195-210 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1979 May 18;241(20):2186-7 - PubMed
    1. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Feb;44(3):381-92 - PubMed
    1. Fam Pract. 1996 Dec;13(6):498-503 - PubMed
    1. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 May;44(382):205-10 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources