Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Guideline
. 1999 Jun;37(6):687-93.
doi: 10.1515/CCLM.1999.107.

Use of biochemical markers in acute coronary syndromes. IFCC Scientific Division, Committee on Standardization of Markers of Cardiac Damage. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry

Affiliations
Guideline

Use of biochemical markers in acute coronary syndromes. IFCC Scientific Division, Committee on Standardization of Markers of Cardiac Damage. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry

M Panteghini et al. Clin Chem Lab Med. 1999 Jun.

Abstract

This paper presents evidence and suggestions from the IFCC Committee on "Standardization of Markers of Cardiac Damage" (C-SMCD) on the use of biochemical markers for the triage diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes. There is general agreement that both 'early' and 'definitive' biochemical markers of myocardial damage are necessary and that these assays must be available with a turnaround time of 1 h or less. Currently, myoglobin is the marker that most effectively fits the role as an 'early' marker, whereas 'definitive' markers are cardiac troponins. Since the sensitivity of the initial electrocardiogram is only 50% for detecting myocardial infarction, the use of biochemical markers may significantly contribute to the early diagnosis and become relevant when the electrocardiogram is not diagnostic. In addition, new sensitive biochemical markers, particularly the cardiac troponins, are presently the best to detect the presence of minor myocardial cell damage. With regard to this, two decision limits are probably needed for the optimal use of troponins: a low abnormal value suggesting the presence of myocardial damage and a higher value suggesting the diagnosis of myocardial infarction according to traditionally used criteria. Properly designed studies should be performed to establish limits for each commercially available troponin assay. Finally, it is recognized that there is no need for the use of any biochemical marker when the clinical diagnosis is unequivocal, other than for diagnosing reinfarction, estimating the infarct size, and monitoring thrombolytic therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources