Double gloving and a system for identifying glove perforations in maxillofacial trauma surgery

Abstract

The treatment of some maxillofacial fractures has an incidence of glove perforation as high as 50%, with over 80% going unnoticed at the time of operation. We investigated double gloving and a glove perforation indication system to ascertain whether the latter offered any additional protection. 1061 gloves used for 113 patients were examined. The outer glove perforation rate was significantly higher than the inner glove (0.48 compared with 0.10, P < 0.0001). There were fewer unnoticed perforations in the glove perforation indication group than the standard surgical glove group (19% compared with 79%, P < 0.0001). The indication system was most effective in wet operating fields. The perforation rate varied with the type of fracture and treatment. Mandibular fractures that were 'hand-held', while bone-plated had a lower mean number of outer glove perforations/operation than fractures treated with temporary intermaxillary fixation (0.43 compared with 4.62, P < 0.0001).