Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Mar;30(2):79-81.
doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(98)00200-9.

Is routine removal of intramedullary nails justified

Affiliations

Is routine removal of intramedullary nails justified

T O Boerger et al. Injury. 1999 Mar.

Abstract

This study investigates the outcome of 100 cases of lower limb intramedullary nail removal. 12 femoral and 25 tibial nails were removed for pain and 4 tibial nails for infection. For 22 tibial nails and 38 femoral nails there was no recorded indication. There where 3 operative complications, 2 abandoned procedures and 1 tibial fracture (nail extraction without prior removal of the distal locking screw). In 9 out of 16 cases anterior knee pain improved after tibial nail removal. 4 patients, previously asymptomatic, developed anterior knee pain following tibial nail removal. 40 patients who were discharged without crutches returned in pain and had to be given crutches to alleviate leg pain. 62 patients took a mean of 11 days sick leave. We conclude that all complications were avoidable. Intramedullary nail removal is safe. Patients with anterior knee pain should be told that their pain may persist and that knee pain may even arise. Most patients will require crutches and an average of 2 weeks away from work.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources