Urinary morbidity following ultrasound-guided transperineal prostate seed implantation
- PMID: 10477007
- DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00176-5
Urinary morbidity following ultrasound-guided transperineal prostate seed implantation
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the urinary morbidity experienced by patients undergoing ultrasound-guided, permanent transperineal seed implantation for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
Methods and materials: Between September 1992 and September 1997, 693 consecutive patients presented with a diagnosis of clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate, and were treated with ultrasound-guided transperineal interstitial permanent brachytherapy (TPIPB). Ninety-three patients are excluded from this review, having received neoadjuvant antiandrogen therapy. TPIPB was performed with 125I in 165 patients and with 103Pd in 435 patients. Patients treated with implant alone received 160 Gy with 125I (pre TG43) or 120 Gy with 103Pd. One hundred two patients received preimplant, pelvic external beam radiation (XRT) to a dose of either 41.4 or 45 Gy because of high-risk features including PSA > or = 10 and/or Gleason score > or = 7. Combined modality patients received 120 Gy and 90 Gy, respectively for 125I or 103Pd. All patients underwent postimplant cystoscopy and placement of an indwelling Foley catheter for 24-48 h. Follow-up was at 5 weeks after implant, every 3 months for the first 2 years, and then every 6 months for subsequent years. Patients completed AUA urinary symptom scoring questionnaires at initial consultation and at each follow-up visit. Urinary toxicity was classified by the RTOG toxicity scale with the following adaptations; grade 1 urinary toxicity was symptomatic nocturia or frequency requiring none or minimal medical intervention such as phenazopyridine; grade 2 urinary toxicity was early obstructive symptomatology requiring alpha-blocker therapy; and grade 3 toxicity was considered that requiring indwelling catheters or posttreatment transurethral resection of the prostate for symptom relief. Log-rank analysis and Chi-square testing was performed to assess AUA score, prostate size, isotope selection, and the addition of XRT as possible prognosticators of postimplant urinary toxicity. The prostate volume receiving 150% of the prescribed dose (V150) was studied in patients to assess its correlation with urinary toxicity.
Results: Median follow-up was 37 months (range 6-68). Within the first 60 days, 37.3% of the patients reported grade 1 urinary toxicity, 41% had grade 2, and 2.2% had grade 3 urinary toxicity. By 6 months, 21.4% still reported grade 1 urinary toxicity, whereas 12.8% and 3% complained of grade 2 and 3 urinary difficulties, respectively. Patients with a preimplant AUA score < or = 7 had significantly less grade II toxicity at 60 days compared to those with an AUA score of >7 (32% vs. 59.2%, respectively, p = 0.001). Similarly, prostatic volumes < or = 35 cc had a significantly lower incidence of grade II urinary toxicity (p = 0.001). There was no difference in toxicity regarding the isotope used (p = 0.138 at 60 days, p = 0.45 at 6 months) or the addition of preimplant XRT (p = 0.069 at 60 days, p = 0.84 at 6 months). Twenty-eight patients (4.7%) underwent TURP after 3 isotope half-lives for protracted obstructive symptoms. Five of these men (17%) developed stress incontinence following TURP, but all patients experienced relief of their obstructive symptoms without morbidity at last follow-up. The percent of the prostate receiving 150% of the prescribed dose (V150) did not predict urinary toxicity.
Conclusions: TPIPB is well tolerated but associated with mild to moderate urinary morbidity. Pretreatment prostatic volume and AUA scoring were shown to significantly predict for grade 2 toxicity while the use of preimplant, pelvic XRT and isotope selection did not. Patients undergoing TURP for protracted symptoms following TPIPB did well with a 17% risk of developing stress incontinence. V150 did not help identify patients at risk for urinary morbidity. As transperineal prostate implantation is used more frequently the associated toxicities and the definition of possible pretreatment prognostic factors is necessary to
Comment in
-
125 Gy or 135 Gy? Comments on the American Brachytherapy Society article by Beyer et al. IJROBP 2000;47:273-275.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Mar 1;49(3):897-8. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)01391-2. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001. PMID: 11265653 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Isotope selection for patients undergoing prostate brachytherapy.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Sep 1;45(2):391-5. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00187-x. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999. PMID: 10487561
-
Urinary morbidity with a modified peripheral loading technique of transperineal (125)i prostate implantation.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 May 1;47(2):353-60. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00433-8. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000. PMID: 10802359
-
Acute urinary toxicity following transperineal prostate brachytherapy using a modified Quimby loading method.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Jul 15;50(4):937-45. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01530-9. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001. PMID: 11429221
-
Urinary morbidity and incontinence following transurethral resection of the prostate after brachytherapy.J Urol. 2005 Mar;173(3):808-12. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000152698.20487.0e. J Urol. 2005. PMID: 15711274 Review.
-
Preliminary toxicity and prostate-specific antigen response of a Phase I/II trial of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, 103Pd brachytherapy, and three-dimensional conformal external beam irradiation in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer.Brachytherapy. 2002;1(1):2-10. doi: 10.1016/s1538-4721(02)00006-5. Brachytherapy. 2002. PMID: 15062181 Review.
Cited by
-
Optimal management of prostate cancer with lethal biology--state-of-the-art local therapy.Asian J Androl. 2015 Nov-Dec;17(6):888-91. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.156855. Asian J Androl. 2015. PMID: 26178396 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Acute urinary morbidity following I-125 prostate brachytherapy.Int J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug;10(4):262-8. doi: 10.1007/s10147-005-0507-8. Int J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 16136372
-
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer in men with large prostates (≥50 cm(3)).Radiat Oncol. 2014 Nov 15;9:241. doi: 10.1186/s13014-014-0241-3. Radiat Oncol. 2014. PMID: 25398516 Free PMC article.
-
Iodine-125 seed brachytherapy for early stage prostate cancer: a single-institution review.Radiat Oncol. 2015 Feb 22;10:49. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0349-0. Radiat Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25880809 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment- and disease-related complications of prostate cancer.Rev Urol. 2006;8 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S56-67. Rev Urol. 2006. PMID: 17021643 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous