Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1999 Feb;12(1):9-13.

Caries-preventive effects of sodium and amine fluoride dentifrices

Affiliations
  • PMID: 10477992
Comparative Study

Caries-preventive effects of sodium and amine fluoride dentifrices

J M Warrick et al. Am J Dent. 1999 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the comparative effects of sodium (NaF) and amine fluoride dentifrices, as well as the effect of different silica abrasives used in NaF dentifrices, on caries formation in rats.

Materials and methods: Harlan Sprague Dawley mixed sex, weanling, littermate rats were fed a cariogenic diet and inoculated with S. sobrinus strain 6715 to induce caries formation. The dentifrices evaluated contained 0.31% NaF with precipitated silica I as the abrasive system; 0.31% NaF with sodium bicarbonate and hydrated silica; placebo; amine fluoride (0.14%) containing silica (Elmex); 0.31% NaF with precipitated silica II (Sensodyne F); and 0.31% NaF with hydrated silica. Dentifrice slurries were administered 7 days per week for 3 weeks at which time the animals were euthanized and the hemijaws removed, coded and stained with a murexide solution. The recovery of S. sobrinus after the 3-week study clearly showed that all of the six groups were infected with S. sobrinus. The Keyes scoring method was then used to assess the caries formation within the six groups.

Results: Caries scores showed that all five experimental fluoride dentifrices were equally efficacious statistically in reducing caries formation when compared to the placebo with reductions ranging from 26 to 43%.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources