Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars
- PMID: 10488002
- PMCID: PMC28229
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.753
Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars
Abstract
Objectives: To explore the views of general practice registrars about involving patients in decisions and to assess the feasibility of using the shared decision making model by means of simulated general practice consultations.
Design: Qualitative study based on focus group interviews.
Setting: General practice vocational training schemes in south Wales.
Participants: 39 general practice registrars and eight course organisers (acting as observers) attended four sessions; three simulated patients attended each time.
Method: After an introduction to the principles and suggested stages of shared decision making the registrars conducted and observed a series of consultations about choices of treatment with simulated patients using verbal, numerical, and graphical data formats. Reactions were elicited by using focus group interviews after each consultation and content analysis undertaken.
Results: Registrars in general practice report not being trained in the skills required to involve patients in clinical decisions. They had a wide range of opinions about "involving patients in decisions," ranging from protective paternalism ("doctor knows best"), through enlightened self interest (lightening the load), to the potential rewards of a more egalitarian relationship with patients. The work points to three contextual precursors for the process: the availability of reliable information, appropriate timing of the decision making process, and the readiness of patients to accept an active role in their own management.
Conclusions: Sharing decisions entails sharing the uncertainties about the outcomes of medical processes and involves exposing the fact that data are often unavailable or not known; this can cause anxiety to both patient and clinician. Movement towards further patient involvement will depend on both the skills and the attitudes of professionals, and this work shows the steps that need to be taken if further progress is to be made in this direction.
Comment in
-
Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up-and there's no going back.BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):719-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.719. BMJ. 1999. PMID: 10487980 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 27820528
-
General practice registrar responses to the use of different risk communication tools in simulated consultations: a focus group study.BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):749-52. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.749. BMJ. 1999. PMID: 10488001 Free PMC article.
-
Achieving involvement: process outcomes from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice.Fam Pract. 2004 Aug;21(4):337-46. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh401. Fam Pract. 2004. PMID: 15249520 Clinical Trial.
-
Shared decision-making in primary care: tailoring the Charles et al. model to fit the context of general practice.Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Aug;62(2):205-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.07.003. Epub 2005 Aug 31. Patient Educ Couns. 2006. PMID: 16139467 Review.
-
Patients' attitudes to general practice registrars: a review of the literature.Educ Prim Care. 2009 Sep;20(5):371-8. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2009.11493812. Educ Prim Care. 2009. PMID: 19849904 Review.
Cited by
-
What to give the patient who has everything? A qualitative study of prescribing for multimorbidity in primary care.Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Mar;65(632):e184-91. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X684001. Br J Gen Pract. 2015. PMID: 25733440 Free PMC article.
-
The role of physician-patient communication in promoting patient-participatory decision making.Health Expect. 2010 Mar;13(1):33-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00578.x. Epub 2009 Oct 29. Health Expect. 2010. PMID: 19878341 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions.Implement Sci. 2006 Aug 9;1:16. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-16. Implement Sci. 2006. PMID: 16899124 Free PMC article.
-
Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice.J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1361-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6. Epub 2012 May 23. J Gen Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22618581 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluating high dose therapy in Multiple Myeloma: use of quality-adjusted survival analysis.Qual Life Res. 2002 Mar;11(2):91-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1015096313594. Qual Life Res. 2002. PMID: 12018742 Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Ong LML, de Haes JCJM, Hoos AM, Lammes FB. Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40:903–918. - PubMed
-
- Gafni A, Charles C, Whelan T. The physician-patient encounter: the physician as a perfect agent for the patient versus the informed decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:347–354. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources