Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1999 Oct;37(10):3083-91.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.10.3083-3091.1999.

Amplified-fragment length polymorphism analysis: the state of an art

Affiliations
Review

Amplified-fragment length polymorphism analysis: the state of an art

P H Savelkoul et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Oct.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Schematic representation of the AFLP analysis principle. 1, point mutations incorporated in the adapter sequences to prevent digestion after ligation are shaded. 2, one of the primers is labeled. In this representation both primers contain one selective nucleotide (shaded) in the unknown fragment.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
Example of fluorescently labeled AFLP patterns and dendrogram for 11 different Klebsiella isolates. Patterns are the result of amplification of templates generated after restriction and ligation as shown in Fig. 1. The fragments were analyzed on an automated Vistra sequencer (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech). The dendrogram was constructed with GelCompar (Applied Maths) software by using the Pearson correlation and cluster analysis by the unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages. Percentages of similarity and molecular sizes (in base pairs) are shown above the dendrogram. Lanes 1 to 8, identical Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates; lanes 9 and 10, different K. pneumoniae strains; lane 11, a Klebsiella oxytoca strain. Within the AFLP patterns from Klebsiella, for instance, three windows of similarity may be applicable on the basis of the described experimental conditions: window I, 90 to 100% homology, identical strains; window II, 60 to 90% homology, different strains, same species (e.g., Klebsiella pneumoniae); window III, 40 to 60% homology, different species of the same genus; window IV, less than 40% homology, species from different genera.
FIG. 3
FIG. 3
Relative applicability of various fingerprinting and DNA techniques at different levels of taxonomic resolution. Reprinted from reference with permission of the publishers. tRNA-PCR, tRNA intergenic spacer region PCR; ITS-PCR, 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region PCR; LFRA, low-frequency restriction enzyme analysis; AP-PCR, arbitrarily primed PCR. The other abbreviations are defined in the text.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aarts H J M, van Lith L A J T, Keijer J. High-resolution genotyping of Salmonella strains by AFLP-fingerprinting. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1998;26:131–135. - PubMed
    1. Ajmone-Marsan P, Valentini A, Cassandro M, Vecchiotti-Antaldi G, Bertoni G, Kuiper M. AFLP markers for DNA fingerprinting in cattle. Anim Genet. 1997;28:418–426. - PubMed
    1. Akerman S, Tammisola J, Regina M, Kauppinen V. Segregation of AFLP markers in Betula pendula (Roth) Forest Gen. 1996;3:117–123.
    1. Arnold C, Metherell L, Clewley J P, Stanley J. Predictive modelling of fluorescent AFLP: a new approach to the molecular epidemiology of E. coli. Res Microbiol. 1999;150:33–44. - PubMed
    1. Bachem C W, van der Hoeven R S, de Bruijn S M, Vreugdenhil D, Zabeau M, Visser R G. Visualization of differential gene expression using a novel method of RNA fingerprinting based on AFLP: analysis of gene expression during potato tuber development. Plant J. 1996;9:745–753. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources