The effect of genotype, age, sex, and caste on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.)
- PMID: 10488557
- DOI: 10.1007/s003590050379
The effect of genotype, age, sex, and caste on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.)
Abstract
Bees derived from artificially selected high- and low-pollen-hoarding strains were tested for their proboscis extension reflex response to water and varying sucrose concentrations. High-strain bees had a lower response threshold to sucrose than low-strain bees among pre-foragers, foragers, queens and drones. Pre-foraging low-strain workers showed ontogenetic changes in their response threshold to sucrose which was inversely related to age. High-strain foragers were more likely to return with loads of water compared to low-strain foragers. Whereas low-strain foragers were more likely to return with loads of nectar. Low-strain nectar foragers collected nectar with significantly higher sucrose concentrations than did the high-strain nectar foragers. Alternatively, low-strain foragers were more likely to return empty compared to high-strain foragers. These studies demonstrate how a genotypically varied sensory-physiological process, the perception of sucrose, are associated with a division of labor for foraging.
Similar articles
-
The effect of genotype on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).J Comp Physiol A. 1998 Apr;182(4):489-500. doi: 10.1007/s003590050196. J Comp Physiol A. 1998. PMID: 9565478
-
The effects of foraging role and genotype on light and sucrose responsiveness in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).Behav Brain Res. 2009 Dec 14;205(1):132-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.07.022. Epub 2009 Jul 28. Behav Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19643145
-
The effects of genotype, foraging role, and sucrose responsiveness on the tactile learning performance of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2001 Sep;76(2):138-50. doi: 10.1006/nlme.2000.3996. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2001. PMID: 11502146
-
8. The development and evolution of division of labor and foraging specialization in a social insect (Apis mellifera L.).Curr Top Dev Biol. 2006;74:253-86. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(06)74008-X. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2006. PMID: 16860670 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nutritional Physiology and Ecology of Honey Bees.Annu Rev Entomol. 2018 Jan 7;63:327-344. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043423. Epub 2017 Oct 13. Annu Rev Entomol. 2018. PMID: 29029590 Review.
Cited by
-
Pharmacological modulation of aversive responsiveness in honey bees.Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Jan 7;7:221. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00221. eCollection 2013. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24431993 Free PMC article.
-
Behavioral and neural plasticity caused by early social experiences: the case of the honeybee.Front Physiol. 2013 Aug 23;4:41. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00041. eCollection 2013. Front Physiol. 2013. PMID: 23986708 Free PMC article.
-
Genetics of reproduction and regulation of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) social behavior.Annu Rev Genet. 2012;46:97-119. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155610. Epub 2012 Aug 28. Annu Rev Genet. 2012. PMID: 22934646 Free PMC article.
-
PKA and PKC content in the honey bee central brain differs in genotypic strains with distinct foraging behavior.J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2003 Jul;189(7):555-62. doi: 10.1007/s00359-003-0433-z. Epub 2003 Jun 21. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2003. PMID: 12827422
-
Individual consistency in the learning abilities of honey bees: cognitive specialization within sensory and reinforcement modalities.Anim Cogn. 2023 Jun;26(3):909-928. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01741-2. Epub 2023 Jan 6. Anim Cogn. 2023. PMID: 36609813 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical