Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Aug;49(8):275-83.

[Questionnaire of self-efficacy, optimism and pessimism: reconstruction, selection of items and validation of an instrument by means of examinations of clinical samples]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 10488648

[Questionnaire of self-efficacy, optimism and pessimism: reconstruction, selection of items and validation of an instrument by means of examinations of clinical samples]

[Article in German]
G Scholler et al. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 1999 Aug.

Abstract

Self-efficacy and optimism are considered highly useful parameters in the context of therapeutic indication prognosis, and outcome evaluation. In our study, a combined questionnaire measuring "self-efficacy" (Schwarzer u. Jerusalem 1986) and "optimism" (Scheier u. Carver 1985) was restructured and reduced in length. The resulting instrument was compared with its original version in five different clinical samples comprising n = 726 inpatients. Factor analyses achieved the bidimensionality in the construct "optimism" as postulated by Scheier and Carver, this yielding the two factors "optimism" and "pessimism". The statistical validation resulted in good to optimal values. Factor analyses considering the different clinical groups showed that certain items failed to be invariably approprieted to one factor. Therefore, we decided in favor of an item reduction, resulting in half the original number: 5 items representing "self-efficacy" 2 for "optimism" and 2 for "pessimism". The scale values of the reduced version showed no relevant deviations compared to the original, and hence we conclude that the reduction does not result in a loss of information.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types