Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 May;40(5):341-4.

The therapeutic efficacy of mometasone furoate cream 0.1% applied once daily vs clobetasol propionate cream 0.05% applied twice daily in chronic eczema

Affiliations
  • PMID: 10489492
Clinical Trial

The therapeutic efficacy of mometasone furoate cream 0.1% applied once daily vs clobetasol propionate cream 0.05% applied twice daily in chronic eczema

C L Goh et al. Singapore Med J. 1999 May.

Abstract

Background: Mometasone furoate [9a, 21-dichloro-llb, 17dihydroxy-16a-methyl-pregna-14-dione-3, 20-dione-17-(2furoate)] is a synthetic, 17-heterocyclic corticosteroid which has been shown to be highly effective as an anti-inflammatory agent which is approximately half as potent is suppressing hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function as betamethasone valerate.

Method: The present open, randomised, third party blinded, left-right sided study was designed to compare the therapeutic efficacy of mometasone furoate cream 0.1% with clobetasol propionate cream 0.05% applied twice daily in chronic eczema following a 3-week course of therapy.

Patients/results: Sixty consecutive patients with moderate to severe bilateral chronic eczema on the limbs were recruited into the study. The mean scores of various signs/symptoms including erythema, induration, crusting, scaling, excoriation and pruritus before and after 3 weeks treatment with mometasone furoate (MF) and clobetasol propionate (CP) cream, were compared. The baseline scores for MF and CP treated sites were almost identical. There was significant decrease in the mean scores of all signs/symptoms after 3 weeks treatment with MF and CP. There was also a significant difference in the mean scores between MF and CP treated sites after 3 weeks of treatment. The mean scores were significantly lower for CP treated sites than MF treated sites. More CP treated sites achieved "cleared" or "marked improvement" response than MF treated sites. There were more "excellent" or "good" grades on CP treated sites than MF treated sites at the end of 3 weeks of treatment. None of the patients showed any side-effects after 4 weeks of treatment.

Conclusion: Overall, 53% of patients considered the MF treated sites to be good or excellent vs 88% for CP treated sites.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources