Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 Sep 11;354(9182):906-9.
doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)12083-4.

Serotherapy in scorpion envenomation: a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Serotherapy in scorpion envenomation: a randomised controlled trial

F Abroug et al. Lancet. .

Abstract

Background: Evidence for the benefit of scorpion antivenom, the only specific treatment for scorpion envenomation, is scarce, despite its common use. We did a prospective, randomised, controlled trial to assess the efficacy of routine administration of scorpion antivenom to scorpion-stung patients, irrespective of clinical severity.

Methods: We included 825 consecutive patients older than 10 years, who presented to the accident and emergency department of the hospital in Tozeur, Tunisia. We graded severity by absence (grade I) or presence (grade II) of systemic manifestations of scorpion envenomation. Patients were randomly assigned placebo (n=413) or 20 mL bivalent intraveneous scorpion antivenom (n=412). All patients were observed for 4 h. Patients who developed life-threatening symptoms were admitted to the intensive-care unit. At the end of 4 h observation we reassessed grade and discharged grade II patients and admitted grade II patients. We assessed the preventive and curative effects of scorpion antivenom by prevention of worsening grade or by improvement from grade II to grade I.

Findings: Distribution of severity grades was similar in the two groups at baseline, as were the cure rates (55% scorpion antivenom, 66% placebo, absolute difference, 11% [95% CI -4.8 to 26.8]; p=0.234). Preventive effects were seen in 94% and 96% of patients in the scorpion antivenom and placebo groups, respectively, who were initially grade I and who remained symptom-free (absolute difference, 2% [-1.27 to 5.27]; p=0.377). Time from scorpion sting to administration of scorpion antivenom did not affect curative and preventive effects.

Interpretation: We found no benefit in routine administration of scorpion antivenom after scorpion sting, irrespective of clinical severity. Future studies should focus on patients with the most severe symptoms and signs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Antivenom for scorpion sting.
    Burdett T, McIntosh H, Murphy K, Parry R, Slater F. Burdett T, et al. Lancet. 2000 Jan 1;355(9197):66-7; author reply 67-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)72006-7. Lancet. 2000. PMID: 10615910 No abstract available.
  • Antivenom for scorpion sting.
    Possani LD. Possani LD. Lancet. 2000 Jan 1;355(9197):67; author reply 67-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)72007-9. Lancet. 2000. PMID: 10615911 No abstract available.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources