Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Aug;56(8):562-6.
doi: 10.1136/oem.56.8.562.

Residential exposure to magnetic fields: an empirical examination of alternative measurement strategies

D Baris  1 , M S Linet, R E Tarone, R A Kleinerman, E E Hatch, W T Kaune, L L Robison, J Lubin, S Wacholder
Affiliations

Residential exposure to magnetic fields: an empirical examination of alternative measurement strategies

D Baris et al. Occup Environ Med. 1999 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the impact of measuring a single home then imputing information from another home among subjects who lived in two homes in a subset of the National Cancer Institute/Children's Cancer Group (NCI/CCG) investigation of residential exposure to magnetic fields and risk of childhood leukaemia.

Methods: Each subject's summary time weighted average (TWA) exposure was derived from measurements of two homes, weighted by the fraction of the reference period lived in the residence. The three cost efficient field work strategies examined were measuring: (a) the longer lived in home; (b) the currently lived in home; and (c) the former lived in home. Two different methods were used for imputing the missing values: (a) control mean imputation, (b) status specific mean imputation. The subject's summary exposure to magnetic fields estimated with each approach was compared with the subject's TWA calculated from measurements in both homes. The association between estimated exposure to magnetic fields and the risk of leukaemia under different approaches was examined with unconditional logistic regression analysis.

Results: The Pearson correlation coefficient between the two measurements within subjects was 0.31 (p < 10(-4), indicating a lack of independence of measurements. Differences were found between mean exposures in current and former homes of cases, and between longer and shorter lived in homes of controls. All methods with measurements from one of the homes in conjunction with imputation of measurements for the second home led to marked attenuation of risk estimates at the highest exposure category, particularly when measurements from current homes were used and those from former homes were imputed.

Conclusion: Results argue against attempting to estimate lifetime magnetic field exposure from imputed values derived from current residences to fill in gaps caused by unmeasured residences previously lived in.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Health Phys. 1990 Dec;59(6):807-17 - PubMed
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1991 Nov 1;134(9):923-37 - PubMed
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Dec 21;86(24):1829-37 - PubMed
    1. Epidemiology. 1997 Sep;8(5):575-83 - PubMed
    1. Epidemiology. 1996 Sep;7(5):490-7 - PubMed