This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Editorial

. 1999 Sep 15;282(11):1083-5.

doi: 10.1001/jama.282.11.1083.

Measuring the quality of trials: the quality of quality scales

J A Berlin, D Rennie

PMID: 10493209
DOI: 10.1001/jama.282.11.1083

Editorial

Measuring the quality of trials: the quality of quality scales

J A Berlin et al. JAMA. 1999.

. 1999 Sep 15;282(11):1083-5.

doi: 10.1001/jama.282.11.1083.

Authors

J A Berlin, D Rennie

PMID: 10493209
DOI: 10.1001/jama.282.11.1083

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis.
Jüni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, Egger M. Jüni P, et al. JAMA. 1999 Sep 15;282(11):1054-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.11.1054. JAMA. 1999. PMID: 10493204
Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests.
Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, Bonsel GJ, Prins MH, van der Meulen JH, Bossuyt PM. Lijmer JG, et al. JAMA. 1999 Sep 15;282(11):1061-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.11.1061. JAMA. 1999. PMID: 10493205

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.
- Silverchair Information Systems
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information