Intersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer
- PMID: 10496557
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02238569
Intersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer
Abstract
Purpose: Standard surgical treatment for low rectal cancer situated below 5 cm from the anal verge or at less than 1 cm from the anal ring is abdominoperineal resection. This is because of the necessity both to achieve a sufficient distal margin and to preserve the whole of the anal sphincter. The aim of this study was to evaluate morbidity, oncologic, and functional results of intersphincteric resection with excision of the internal anal sphincter and low coloanal anastomosis for carcinomas of the anorectal junction.
Methods: From January 1990 to December 1996, 16 patients were studied prospectively. All patients had an infiltrating adenocarcinoma (5 T2 and 11 T3), located between 2.5 and 4.5 (mean, 3.6) cm from the anal verge. Rectal resection with a minimum distal margin of 2 (mean, 2.4) cm was performed in all cases; six patients underwent partial resection of the internal sphincter, and ten patients had a subtotal resection. A colonic J-pouch was associated with coloanal anastomoses in eight cases. Twelve patients had preoperative radiotherapy, 3 with concomitant chemotherapy; 5 patients had postoperative chemotherapy.
Results: There was no postoperative mortality. Morbidity occurred in four patients, of whom two underwent permanent colostomy after pelvic hemorrhage or anovaginal fistula. After a median follow-up of 44 (range, 11-92) months, no local recurrence was observed, and two patients died of distal metastases. The five-year actuarial survival rate was 75 percent. Continence was normal in one-half of patients and was altered in the other patients who suffered from occasional minor leaks. The median resting pressure was lower after subtotal than after partial resection of the internal sphincter (40 vs. 70 cm H2O; P = 0.02), but functional results were similar in the two groups.
Conclusion: These preliminary results suggest that intersphincteric resection can be an alternative to abdominoperineal resection for selected rectal tumors situated at the anorectal junction, without compromising chance of cure. Functional results and continence were not altered by subtotal resection of the internal anal sphincter.
Comment in
-
Anorectal mobilization or intersphincteric resection..Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Oct;43(10):1454. doi: 10.1007/BF02236648. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000. PMID: 11052528 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
[Conservative treatment of adenocarcinomas of the anorectal junction by preoperative radiotherapy and intersphincteral resection].Ann Chir. 2000 Sep;125(7):618-24. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3944(00)00262-5. Ann Chir. 2000. PMID: 11051690 French.
-
Preoperative radiochemotherapy and sphincter-saving resection for T3 carcinomas of the lower third of the rectum.Ann Surg. 2001 Nov;234(5):633-40. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200111000-00008. Ann Surg. 2001. PMID: 11685026 Free PMC article.
-
Early results of intersphincteric resection for patients with very low rectal cancer: an active approach to avoid a permanent colostomy.Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Apr;47(4):459-66. doi: 10.1007/s10350-003-0088-4. Epub 2004 Feb 25. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004. PMID: 14978613 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical and molecular prognostic factors in sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer.Semin Radiat Oncol. 1998 Jan;8(1):54-69. doi: 10.1016/s1053-4296(98)80038-6. Semin Radiat Oncol. 1998. PMID: 9516585 Review.
-
[Colonic pouch and other procedures to improve the continence after low anterior rectal resection with TME].Zentralbl Chir. 2008 Apr;133(2):107-15. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1004735. Zentralbl Chir. 2008. PMID: 18415896 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Clinical outcome of intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer.World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jan 28;12(4):640-3. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i4.640. World J Gastroenterol. 2006. PMID: 16489683 Free PMC article.
-
Transverse Coloplasty Pouch versus Straight Coloanal Anastomosis Following Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: the Functional Benefits May Emerge After Two Years.J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Nov;27(11):2526-2537. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05565-w. Epub 2023 Oct 17. J Gastrointest Surg. 2023. PMID: 37848684
-
Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation for Bowel Dysfunction After Intersphincteric Resection for Lower Rectal Cancer.World J Surg. 2018 Oct;42(10):3415-3421. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4596-8. World J Surg. 2018. PMID: 29556878
-
Late anastomotic leakage after anal sphincter saving surgery for rectal cancer: is it different from early anastomotic leakage?Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jul;35(7):1321-1330. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03608-9. Epub 2020 May 5. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020. PMID: 32372379
-
Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: an overview.Int J Surg Oncol. 2012;2012:241512. doi: 10.1155/2012/241512. Epub 2012 Jun 7. Int J Surg Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22778935 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources