Similar articles

• Letter by Fresco regarding article "Primary angioplasty versus fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction: long-term follow-up in the Danish Acute Myocardial Infarction 2 trial".

  Fresco C. Fresco C. Circulation. 2010 Dec 21;122(25):e640; author reply e641. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.958132. Circulation. 2010. PMID: 21173360 No abstract available.
• Primary angioplasty versus fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction: long-term follow-up in the Danish acute myocardial infarction 2 trial.

  Nielsen PH, Maeng M, Busk M, Mortensen LS, Kristensen SD, Nielsen TT, Andersen HR; DANAMI-2 Investigators. Nielsen PH, et al. Circulation. 2010 Apr 6;121(13):1484-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.873224. Epub 2010 Mar 22. Circulation. 2010. PMID: 20308618 Clinical Trial.
• Primary coronary angioplasty compared with intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: six-month follow up and analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials.

  Grines C, Patel A, Zijlstra F, Weaver WD, Granger C, Simes RJ; PCAT Collaborators. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Grines C, et al. Am Heart J. 2003 Jan;145(1):47-57. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2003.40. Am Heart J. 2003. PMID: 12514654 Review.
• Stenting versus thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction trial (STAT).

  [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Indian Heart J. 2001 May-Jun;53(3):375. Indian Heart J. 2001. PMID: 11516047 No abstract available.
• Percutaneous coronary intervention versus thrombolysis: the definite management of st elevation myocardial infarction.

  Martinez-Ojeda J, Martinez-Toro J. Martinez-Ojeda J, et al. Bol Asoc Med P R. 2005 Oct-Dec;97(4):308-14. Bol Asoc Med P R. 2005. PMID: 16599071 Review.