Ethnic differences in patterns of care of stage 1A(1) and stage 1A(2) cervical cancer: a SEER database study
- PMID: 10502436
- DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1999.5543
Ethnic differences in patterns of care of stage 1A(1) and stage 1A(2) cervical cancer: a SEER database study
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate patterns of care for women with Stage 1A(1) and 1A(2) cervical cancer utilizing the SEER database.
Methods: Review of SEER data from 11 registries from 1990 to 1995 was performed. Data from 2358 women were reviewed and stratified by substage, ethnicity, type of therapy, and age.
Results: Three remarkable differences among subgroups were identified. (1) Among women >/=35 years of age, whites were more likely to have Stage 1A(1) cancer than blacks or Hispanics; OR (95% CI) = 1.56 (1. 05, 2.31) and 1.41 (1.04, 1.91), respectively. (2) Patients >/=35 years of age were more likely to undergo hysterectomy than younger patients both for 1A(1) and 1A(2) stages; OR (95% CI) = 2.31 (1.68, 3.19) and 2.78 (2.21, 3.50), respectively, with Mantel-Haenszel test of independence chi(2) = 102.9943, P value < 0.001. (3) Black and Hispanic women >/=35 years of age with 1A(2) disease were less likely to have a hysterectomy than whites. Only 15% of Hispanic patients and 9% of blacks over the age of 35 and with Stage 1A(2) were treated via hysterectomy, compared to 76% of white women. Differences in hysterectomies for <35 years of age, 1A(1) patients approached but did not reach statistical significance: blacks 36% versus Hispanic/whites 59%, P value = 0.07.
Conclusions: Older white women were more likely to have cervical carcinoma diagnosed at an earlier stage (1A(1)) than age-matched blacks or Hispanics. Older patients, across all ethnic groups analyzed, were also more likely to be treated for both Stage 1A(1) and 1A(2) disease via hysterectomy than younger patients. Ethnic differences in the management of women with Stage 1A(2) cervical cancer do exist: older minority women are less likely to have a hysterectomy and more likely to be treated via fertility-sparing, less definitive procedures than whites.
Copyright 1999 Academic Press.
Similar articles
-
Trends in cervical cancer incidence rates by age, race/ethnicity, histological subtype, and stage at diagnosis in the United States.Prev Med. 2019 Jun;123:316-323. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 Apr 16. Prev Med. 2019. PMID: 31002830
-
Persistent Disparities in Hispanics with Cervical Cancer in a Major City.J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017 Apr;4(2):165-168. doi: 10.1007/s40615-016-0214-3. Epub 2016 Mar 11. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017. PMID: 26969160
-
Hysterectomy-corrected incidence rates of cervical and uterine cancers in Massachusetts, 1995 to 2010.Ann Epidemiol. 2014 Nov;24(11):849-54. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.07.018. Epub 2014 Aug 23. Ann Epidemiol. 2014. PMID: 25241148
-
Cervical cancer survival in a high risk urban population.Cancer. 1995 Dec 15;76(12):2518-23. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19951215)76:12<2518::aid-cncr2820761217>3.0.co;2-#. Cancer. 1995. PMID: 8625079 Review.
-
Risk factors for invasive cervical cancer in Latino women.J Med Syst. 1996 Oct;20(5):277-93. doi: 10.1007/BF02257041. J Med Syst. 1996. PMID: 9001995 Review.
Cited by
-
Gynecologic cancer outcomes in the elderly poor: A population-based study.Cancer. 2015 Oct 15;121(20):3591-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29541. Epub 2015 Jul 31. Cancer. 2015. PMID: 26230631 Free PMC article.
-
Disparities in Gynecological Malignancies.Front Oncol. 2016 Feb 22;6:36. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00036. eCollection 2016. Front Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26942126 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Understanding the Interplay Between Health Disparities and Epigenomics.Front Genet. 2020 Aug 20;11:903. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00903. eCollection 2020. Front Genet. 2020. PMID: 32973872 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of health beliefs on delays in care for abnormal cervical cytology in a multi-ethnic population.J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Sep;17(9):709-16. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.11231.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2002. PMID: 12220368 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of payer status on treatment of cervical cancer at a tertiary referral center.Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Aug;122(2):324-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.04.038. Epub 2011 May 28. Gynecol Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21620446 Free PMC article.