Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Sep;54(9):598-603.
doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(99)90022-3.

Management of patients treated with aspirin or warfarin and evaluation of haemostasis prior to prostatic biopsy: a survey of current practice amongst radiologists and urologists

Affiliations

Management of patients treated with aspirin or warfarin and evaluation of haemostasis prior to prostatic biopsy: a survey of current practice amongst radiologists and urologists

S E Connor et al. Clin Radiol. 1999 Sep.

Abstract

Aim: To document current practice concerning the management of patients taking aspirin or warfarin and the evaluation of haemostatic function prior to prostatic biopsy.

Method: A postal survey was performed with typed questionnaires being sent to 275 urology and 275 radiology centres.

Results: A high proportion of radiology departments in particular (83%) had protocols in place concerning the management of aspirin or warfarin prior to prostatic biopsy. A significant proportion of both radiologists and urologists have postponed biopsies due to patients unexpectedly taking these medications. Few of the respondents reported the use of pre-biopsy screening blood tests. Fifty-two percent of radiologists and 27% of urologists terminated aspirin prior to prostatic biopsy, although the urologists stopped aspirin for a long time period. Ninety-five percent of radiologists and 84% of urologists terminated warfarin prior to prostatic biopsy, although again the urologists stopped warfarin at an earlier stage. Most of those respondents who stopped warfarin prior to biopsy, also checked the INR. The urologists generally stated a higher threshold (INR) which would be considered too high to proceed.

Conclusion: There are wide variations in practice both within and between the radiology and urology groups. This is unsurprising, since there is conflicting advice in the relevant literature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources