Strategic physician communication and oncology clinical trials
- PMID: 10506636
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.10.3324
Strategic physician communication and oncology clinical trials
Abstract
Purpose: Clinical trials are the primary means for determining new, effective treatments for cancer patients, yet the number of patients that accrue is relatively limited. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between physician behavior and patient accrual to a clinical trial by videotaping the interaction.
Patients and methods: Forty-eight patient-physician interactions involving 12 different oncologists were videotaped in several clinics at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute (Tampa, FL). The purpose of each interaction was to present the possibility of a clinical trial to the patient. A coding system, the Moffitt Accrual Analysis System, was developed by the authors to code behaviors that represented both the legal-informational and social influence models of communication behavior. Thirty-two patients agreed to participate in the clinical trial.
Results: Videotaping was found to be a viable, valid, and reliable method for studying the interaction. Physicians who were observed to use both models of influence were found to enroll more patients. Thus, patients were more likely to accrue to the trial when their physician verbally presented items normally included in an informed consent document and when they behaved in a reflective, patient-centered, supportive, and responsive manner. Discussion of benefits, side effects, patient concerns and resources to manage the concerns were all associated with accrual.
Conclusion: This research has implications for modifying physician behavior and, thus, increasing the numbers of patients accruing to oncology clinical trials.
Similar articles
-
Patients' perceptions of physicians communication and outcomes of the accrual to trial process.Health Commun. 2000;12(1):23-39. doi: 10.1207/S15327027HC1201_02. Health Commun. 2000. PMID: 10938905
-
Seeking informed consent to cancer clinical trials; evaluating the efficacy of doctor communication skills training.Psychooncology. 2007 Jun;16(6):507-16. doi: 10.1002/pon.1095. Psychooncology. 2007. PMID: 16986176
-
Enhancing decision making about participation in cancer clinical trials: development of a question prompt list.Support Care Cancer. 2011 Aug;19(8):1227-38. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0942-6. Epub 2010 Jul 1. Support Care Cancer. 2011. PMID: 20593202 Free PMC article.
-
Communication, accrual to clinical trials, and the physician-patient relationship: implications for training programs.J Cancer Educ. 1996 Summer;11(2):73-9. doi: 10.1080/08858199609528399. J Cancer Educ. 1996. PMID: 8793646 Review.
-
Communication and consumer decision making about cancer clinical trials.Patient Educ Couns. 2003 May;50(1):39-42. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00078-8. Patient Educ Couns. 2003. PMID: 12767583 Review.
Cited by
-
Randomized controlled trial versus comparative cohort study in verifying the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.Int J Clin Oncol. 2013 Apr;18(2):200-6. doi: 10.1007/s10147-012-0499-0. Epub 2012 Dec 1. Int J Clin Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23203151 Review.
-
A prospective analysis of the influence of older age on physician and patient decision-making when considering enrollment in breast cancer clinical trials (SWOG S0316).Oncologist. 2012;17(9):1180-90. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0384. Epub 2012 Jun 20. Oncologist. 2012. PMID: 22723506 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of clinical communication on patients' decision making on participation in clinical trials.J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jun 1;26(16):2666-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8114. J Clin Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18509178 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Knowledge, Attitudes and Perceptions of Saudis towards Participating in Clinical Trials.PLoS One. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0143893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143893. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 26848750 Free PMC article.
-
Therapeutic Clinical Trial Eligibility and Enrollment among Women with Breast Cancer: Implications for Understanding Trial Disparities.Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):2038-2044. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16607-9. Epub 2024 Dec 9. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39653947 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical