Prevalence of congenital anomalies at birth among offspring of women at risk for a genetic disorder and with a normal second-trimester ultrasound
- PMID: 10508977
- DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9926(199910)60:4<240::AID-TERA8>3.0.CO;2-T
Prevalence of congenital anomalies at birth among offspring of women at risk for a genetic disorder and with a normal second-trimester ultrasound
Abstract
The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence and the nature of congenital anomalies found at birth in offspring of women who had a normal second-trimester ultrasound and/or amniocentesis. Two groups of women were studied in our prenatal diagnosis clinic between 1991-1997. Group 1 consisted of pregnant women who had an amniocentesis for advanced maternal age (AMA), or for familial chromosomal or monogenic disorders. Group 2 consisted of pregnant women attending the prenatal diagnosis clinic and who had no indication for amniocentesis. Those with an abnormal ultrasound and/or amniocentesis were excluded. At the time of delivery, a questionnaire was sent pertaining to perinatal complications and the anomalies detected during the neonatal period. From a total of 15, 370 questionnaires sent from 1991-1997, 10,823 (group 1, n = 8,877; group 2, n = 1,946) were returned (overall response rate, 70.4%). Mean maternal age was 36 years in group 1 and 29 years in group 2. The prevalence of perinatal complications was similar in the two groups. In each group, the prevalence of all unforeseen anomalies was 2.9%. In group 1, the distribution of those anomalies was: major anomalies, 67.7%; minor anomalies, 23.9%; and multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), 8.3%. In group 2, the distribution was: major anomalies, 70.7%; minor anomalies, 24.1%; and MCA, 5.2%. In patients at risk for a genetic disease and consulting in a prenatal diagnosis clinic, the prevalence of all anomalies diagnosed at birth was 2.9%, even if the second-trimester ultrasound and amniocentesis results were normal. Therefore, it is important to inform those couples of this remaining risk.
Copyright 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Second-trimester minor ultrasound anomalies: impact on the risk of aneuploidy associated with advanced maternal age.Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Aug;88(2):203-6. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00134-2. Obstet Gynecol. 1996. PMID: 8692502
-
[Prenatal diagnosis. I: Prenatal diagnosis program at the Medical Genetics Unit of the Universidad de Zulia, Maracaibo, Venezuela].Invest Clin. 1998 Jun;39(2):97-116. Invest Clin. 1998. PMID: 9707921 Spanish.
-
Impact of prenatal mid-trimester screening on the prevalence of fetal structural anomalies: a prospective epidemiological study.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Nov;6(5):320-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.06050320.x. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995. PMID: 8590201
-
Prenatal biochemical screening.J Reprod Med. 1992 May;37(5):403-9. J Reprod Med. 1992. PMID: 1380558 Review.
-
Prenatal diagnosis: practice, pitfalls, and progress.Obstet Gynecol. 1974 Nov;44(5):773-83. Obstet Gynecol. 1974. PMID: 4607620 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
The effect of instruction on knowledge and attitude of couples attending pre-marriage counseling classes.J Educ Health Promot. 2013 Sep 30;2:52. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.119038. eCollection 2013. J Educ Health Promot. 2013. PMID: 24251288 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical