Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Oct;60(4):240-4.
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9926(199910)60:4<240::AID-TERA8>3.0.CO;2-T.

Prevalence of congenital anomalies at birth among offspring of women at risk for a genetic disorder and with a normal second-trimester ultrasound

Affiliations

Prevalence of congenital anomalies at birth among offspring of women at risk for a genetic disorder and with a normal second-trimester ultrasound

E Lemyre et al. Teratology. 1999 Oct.

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence and the nature of congenital anomalies found at birth in offspring of women who had a normal second-trimester ultrasound and/or amniocentesis. Two groups of women were studied in our prenatal diagnosis clinic between 1991-1997. Group 1 consisted of pregnant women who had an amniocentesis for advanced maternal age (AMA), or for familial chromosomal or monogenic disorders. Group 2 consisted of pregnant women attending the prenatal diagnosis clinic and who had no indication for amniocentesis. Those with an abnormal ultrasound and/or amniocentesis were excluded. At the time of delivery, a questionnaire was sent pertaining to perinatal complications and the anomalies detected during the neonatal period. From a total of 15, 370 questionnaires sent from 1991-1997, 10,823 (group 1, n = 8,877; group 2, n = 1,946) were returned (overall response rate, 70.4%). Mean maternal age was 36 years in group 1 and 29 years in group 2. The prevalence of perinatal complications was similar in the two groups. In each group, the prevalence of all unforeseen anomalies was 2.9%. In group 1, the distribution of those anomalies was: major anomalies, 67.7%; minor anomalies, 23.9%; and multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), 8.3%. In group 2, the distribution was: major anomalies, 70.7%; minor anomalies, 24.1%; and MCA, 5.2%. In patients at risk for a genetic disease and consulting in a prenatal diagnosis clinic, the prevalence of all anomalies diagnosed at birth was 2.9%, even if the second-trimester ultrasound and amniocentesis results were normal. Therefore, it is important to inform those couples of this remaining risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources