[More than 4 years' experience with electronic intraocular needle tonometry]
- PMID: 10509080
- DOI: 10.1007/s003470050444
[More than 4 years' experience with electronic intraocular needle tonometry]
Abstract
Background: Applanation tonometry in eyes with pathological corneae can often not be performed or delivers rather questionable results. We report on our 4-year experience with electronic intraocular needle tonometry.
Patients and methods: After since 1994 developing and calibrating a system for intraocular needle tonometry, we have performed 395 measurements in 252 eyes with irregular corneae and suspicion of glaucoma. If applanation tonometry values could be obtained, they were compared with the true intraocular pressure.
Results: Depending on the kind of corneal pathology, applanation tonometry values were lower and sometimes much lower than true intraocular pressure. No serious complications occurred as a result of intraocular needle tonometry.
Conclusions: Intraocular needle tonometry is a safe procedure and is the only way to measure intraocular pressure precisely in eyes with pathological corneae.
Similar articles
-
[Impression and applanation tonometry in irregular corneas. Comparison with intraocular needle tonometry].Ophthalmologe. 2000 Jul;97(7):478-81. doi: 10.1007/s003470070078. Ophthalmologe. 2000. PMID: 10959183 German.
-
Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 May-Jun;40(4):e163-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02670.x. Epub 2011 Oct 20. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012. PMID: 21883774
-
Dynamic contour tonometry for intraocular pressure measurement.Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Aug;140(2):318-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.01.039. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005. PMID: 16086958
-
New ways to measure intraocular pressure.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar;19(2):122-6. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3282f391ae. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008. PMID: 18301285 Review.
-
New technologies for measuring intraocular pressure.Prog Brain Res. 2015;221:67-79. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Oct 1. Prog Brain Res. 2015. PMID: 26518073 Review.
Cited by
-
Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings.Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Jan;85(1):85-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.1.85. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001. PMID: 11133718 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of intraocular tonometry using three different non-invasive tonometers in children.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 Oct;246(10):1463-6. doi: 10.1007/s00417-008-0863-y. Epub 2008 Jun 14. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008. PMID: 18553097
-
IOP measurement and central corneal thickness.Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Jan;86(1):120-1. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.1.120. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002. PMID: 11801523 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
[Correction factors for central corneal thickness in Goldmann applanation tonometry].Ophthalmologe. 2010 Jan;107(1):30-5. doi: 10.1007/s00347-009-1926-0. Ophthalmologe. 2010. PMID: 19506886 German.
-
Intraocular pressure measurement with Corvis ST in comparison with applanation tonometry and Tomey non-contact tonometry.Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov;39(11):2517-2521. doi: 10.1007/s10792-019-01098-5. Epub 2019 Apr 9. Int Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 30968328
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources