Use of sedation during cardioversion with the implantable atrial defibrillator
- PMID: 10510051
- DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.100.14.1499
Use of sedation during cardioversion with the implantable atrial defibrillator
Abstract
Background: The low shock energy used during internal atrial defibrillation may decrease the need for sedation during defibrillation with an implantable atrial defibrillator.
Methods and results: The atrial defibrillator (Metrix Atrioverter) was implanted in 12 patients. During the in-hospital treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) episodes, intravenous sedation was given only on patient request. The Atrioverter was programmed for ambulatory therapy in 4 patients. Efficacy, number of shocks delivered, and sedation requirements were recorded. A total of 393 shocks (1.8+/-1. 6 shocks/AF episode) were delivered to treat 213 AF episodes; 85 of 213 AF episodes (40%) were treated away from the hospital. Sinus rhythm was restored in 195 AF episodes (92%). Five patients never requested sedation. No sedation was needed for ambulatory-treated AF episodes. During the treatment of 26 of 213 AF episodes (12%), 75 shocks were delivered after patients received sedation. The number of shocks required to treat an AF episode determined the need for sedation (4.3+/-2.1 shocks for AF episodes requiring sedation versus 2+/-1 shocks for AF episodes requiring no sedation; P<0.001). These additional shocks were needed to treat immediate reinitiation of AF (14 episodes) or initial failure to cardiovert (4 episodes). For 8 AF episodes, sedation was requested before the first shock.
Conclusions: This study suggests that, in a selected group of patients, AF can be treated with Atrioverter therapy without sedation. Successful ambulatory treatment of AF episodes with the Atrioverter, programmed to deliver </=2 shocks, did not require sedation. When multiple shocks were required to treat an AF episode, the need for sedation increased and included patients initially not requesting sedation.
Similar articles
-
[Atrial defibrillator].Z Kardiol. 2000;89 Suppl 3:206-14. Z Kardiol. 2000. PMID: 10810804 Review. German.
-
[Atrial defibrillator].Herz. 1998 Jun;23(4):251-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03044320. Herz. 1998. PMID: 9690112 Review. German.
-
Internal defibrillation: where we have been and where we should be going?J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005 Aug;13 Suppl 1:61-6. doi: 10.1007/s10840-005-1824-6. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005. PMID: 16133857 Review.
-
Spontaneous episodes of atrial fibrillation after implantation of the Metrix Atrioverter: observations on treated and nontreated episodes. Metrix Investigators.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 May;35(6):1428-33. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00579-9. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000. PMID: 10807443 Clinical Trial.
-
Atrioverter: an implantable device for the treatment of atrial fibrillation.Circulation. 1998 Oct 20;98(16):1651-6. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.16.1651. Circulation. 1998. PMID: 9778331 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Internal Cardioversion with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Device for Atrial Fibrillation in Systolic Heart Failure Patients.Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2016 Mar;21(2):181-8. doi: 10.1111/anec.12282. Epub 2015 Jun 18. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2016. PMID: 26084862 Free PMC article.
-
Do arrhythmias still deserve our intellectual efforts?: The 2002 Wenckebach Lecture of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology.Neth Heart J. 2003 Aug;11(7-8):301-309. Neth Heart J. 2003. PMID: 25696235 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical