Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 Sep;48(3):361-6.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00015.x.

The influence of frusemide formulation on diuretic effect and efficiency

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The influence of frusemide formulation on diuretic effect and efficiency

M Wakelkamp et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 Sep.

Abstract

Aims: Changes in drug delivery rate may result in clinically important changes in drug effects. For the loop diuretic frusemide, it would be desirable to develop controlled release preparations, that could maintain an effective urinary excretion rate over a prolonged period of time. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of frusemide formulation on frusemide recovery, diuretic effect and efficiency.

Methods: Twelve subjects were given 60 mg of four different frusemide controlled release formulations in a single-dose, double-blind, randomized 4-way cross-over design. The formulations were three study drugs with different extended dissolution rates (ER1Tab, ER2Tab and ER3Caps ) and one reference drug (LR). Urinary volume and contents of frusemide in urine were measured in samples collected over 24 h.

Results: Substantial differences in frusemide recovery and diuretic efficiency were observed between LR and all other formulations. At 24 h, mean total frusemide recoveries of ER1Tab, ER2Tab and ER3Caps were 52%, 36% and 57% lower, respectively, compared with LR (P<0.01). Also at 24 h, mean total diuretic efficiency for ER1Tab, ER2Tab and ER3Caps was 83%, 31% and 135% higher, respectively, compared to LR. The rapid dissolution and absorption of LR resulted in a high diuretic response from 0 to 3 h after dosing. However, from 0 to 24 h, there were no differences in diuretic response between the formulations.

Conclusions: Controlled release formulations of frusemide with a low and extended rate of dissolution lead to a more prolonged absorption and subsequent diuresis, but still maintain a similar cumulative response, due to their higher diuretic efficiency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean (s.d.) in vitro dissolution profiles of ER1Tab (•), ER2Tab (▪), ER3Caps (○) and LR (▵).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean frusemide excretion rate (a), induced diuresis (b) and diuretic efficiency (c) vs time following the administration of ER1Tab (•), ER2Tab (▪), ER3Caps (○) and LR (▵).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean in vitro dissolution profiles of 15 batches of Lasix® Retard®.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Banerjee PS, Robinson JR. Novel drug delivery systems: an overview of their impact on clinical pharmacokinetic studies. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1991;20:1–14. - PubMed
    1. Kaojarern S, Day B, Brater DC. The time course of delivery of furosemide into urine: an independent determinant of overall response. Kidney Int. 1982;22:69–74. - PubMed
    1. Alván G, Helleday L, Lindholm A, Sanz E, Villén T. Diuretic effect and diuretic efficiency after intravenous dosage of frusemide. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;29:215–219. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alván G, Paintaud G, Eckernäs S-Å, Grahnén A. Discrepancy between bioavailability as estimated from urinary recovery of frusemide and total diuretic effect. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1992;34:47–52. - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Meyel JJ, Smits P, Russel FG, Gerlag PG, Tan Y, Gribnau FW. Diuretic efficiency of furosemide during continuous administration versus bolus injection in healthy volunteers. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1992;51:440–444. - PubMed

Publication types