Meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with imperfect reference standards
- PMID: 10513757
- DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00086-4
Meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with imperfect reference standards
Abstract
We present a method to estimate the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for combining information on a diagnostic test from several different studies. Unlike previous methods that assume the reference standard to be error free, our approach allows for the possibility of errors in the reference standard, through use of a latent class model. The model provides estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic test and the case prevalence in each study; these parameters can then be used in a meta-analysis, for example, using the regression method proposed by Moses et al., of a measure of test discrimination on a measure of the diagnostic threshold, to fit the SROC. The method is illustrated with an example on Pap smears that shows how adjusting for imperfection in the reference standard typically reduces the scatter of data in the SROC plot, and tends to indicate better performance of the test than otherwise.
Similar articles
-
Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data.Stat Med. 2002 May 15;21(9):1237-56. doi: 10.1002/sim.1099. Stat Med. 2002. PMID: 12111876
-
Bayesian meta-analysis of Papanicolaou smear accuracy.Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Oct;107(1 Suppl 1):S133-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.08.080. Gynecol Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17908587 Free PMC article.
-
Meta-analysis of Pap test accuracy.Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Apr 1;141(7):680-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117485. Am J Epidemiol. 1995. PMID: 7702044
-
Analysis of error in calculating the false-negative rate in the interpretation of cervicovaginal smears: the need to review abnormal cases.Cancer. 1997 Oct 25;81(5):264-71. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19971025)81:5<264::aid-cncr2>3.0.co;2-n. Cancer. 1997. PMID: 9349512 Review.
-
Does a zero error standard exist for the Papanicolaou smear? A pathologist's perspective.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Mar;121(3):301-10. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997. PMID: 9111124 Review.
Cited by
-
Summary diagnostic validity of commonly used maternal major depression disorder case finding instruments in the United States: A meta-analysis.J Affect Disord. 2016 Nov 15;205:335-343. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.014. Epub 2016 Aug 16. J Affect Disord. 2016. PMID: 27566453 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Challenges in the real world use of classification accuracy metrics: From recall and precision to the Matthews correlation coefficient.PLoS One. 2023 Oct 4;18(10):e0291908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291908. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37792898 Free PMC article.
-
Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.Stat Med. 2014 Oct 30;33(24):4141-69. doi: 10.1002/sim.6218. Epub 2014 Jun 9. Stat Med. 2014. PMID: 24910172 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002 Jul 3;2:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-2-9. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002. PMID: 12097142 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of physical examination for the detection of cirrhosis.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2001;1:6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-1-6. Epub 2001 Dec 18. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2001. PMID: 11806763 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials